Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention: development of a digital intervention

  • H. Knight
  • , R. Jia
  • , K. Ayling
  • , K. Bradbury
  • , K. Baker
  • , T. Chalder
  • , J. R. Morling
  • , L. Durrant
  • , T. Avery
  • , Jonathan Ball
  • , C. Barker
  • , R. Bennett
  • , T. McKeever
  • , K. Vedhara
  • University of Nottingham
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Southampton
  • King's College London
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and The University of Nottingham
  • Rehab Studio LTD

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in late 2019, spreading to over 200 countries and resulting in almost two million deaths worldwide. The emergence of safe and effective vaccines provides a route out of the pandemic, with vaccination uptake of 75–90% needed to achieve population protection. Vaccine hesitancy is problematic for vaccine rollout; global reports suggest only 73% of the population may agree to being vaccinated. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop equitable and accessible interventions to address vaccine hesitancy at the population level. Study design: & Method: We report the development of a scalable digital intervention seeking to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and enhance uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom. Guided by motivational interviewing (MI) principles, the intervention includes a series of therapeutic dialogues addressing 10 key concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals. Development of the intervention occurred linearly across four stages. During stage 1, we identified common reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy through analysis of existing survey data, a rapid systematic literature review, and public engagement workshops. Stage 2 comprised qualitative interviews with medical, immunological, and public health experts. Rapid content and thematic analysis of the data provided evidence-based responses to common vaccine concerns. Stage 3 involved the development of therapeutic dialogues through workshops with psychological and digital behaviour change experts. Dialogues were developed to address concerns using MI principles, including embracing resistance and supporting self-efficacy. Finally, stage 4 involved digitisation of the dialogues and pilot testing with members of the public. Discussion: The digital intervention provides an evidence-based approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy through MI principles. The dialogues are user-selected, allowing exploration of relevant issues associated with hesitancy in a non-judgmental context. The text-based content and digital format allow for rapid modification to changing information and scalability for wider dissemination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-107
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Intervention
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Vaccine hesitancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention: development of a digital intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this