Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Traveller exposures to animals: A GeoSentinel analysis: A GeoSentinel analysis

  • GeoSentinel Surveillance Network
  • , Michael P. Muehlenbein
  • , Kristina M. Angelo
  • , Patricia Schlagenhauf
  • , Lin Chen
  • , Martin P. Grobusch
  • , Philippe Gautret
  • , Alexandre Duvignaud
  • , François Chappuis
  • , Kevin C. Kain
  • , Emmanuel Bottieau
  • , Loïc Epelboin
  • , Marc Shaw
  • , Noreen Hynes
  • , Davidson H. Hamer
  • Baylor University
  • University of Zurich
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Mount Auburn Hospital
  • Academic Medical Center
  • Méditerranée Infection Foundation
  • Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin
  • University of Geneva
  • Toronto General Hospital
  • Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
  • Centre Hospitalier Andree Rosemon
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Boston University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Human coexistence with other animals can result in both intentional and unintentional contact with a variety of mammalian and non-mammalian species. International travellers are at risk for such encounters; travellers risk injury, infection and possibly death from domestic and wild animal bites, scratches, licks and other exposures. The aim of the present analysis was to understand the diversity and distribution of animal-related exposures among international travellers. Methods: Data from January 2007 through December 2018 from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network were reviewed. Records were included if the exposure was non-migration travel with a diagnosis of an animal (dog, cat, monkey, snake or other) bite or other exposure (non-bite); records were excluded if the region of exposure was not ascertainable or if another, unrelated acute diagnosis was reported. Results: A total of 6470 animal exposures (bite or non-bite) were included. The majority (71%) occurred in Asia. Travellers to 167 countries had at least one report of an animal bite or non-bite exposure. The majority (76%) involved dogs, monkeys and cats, although a wide range of wild and domestic species were involved. Almost two-thirds (62.6%) of 4395 travellers with information available did not report a pretravel consultation with a healthcare provider. Conclusions: Minimizing bites and other animal exposures requires education (particularly during pretravel consultations) and behavioral modification. These should be supplemented by the use of pre-exposure rabies vaccination for travellers to high-risk countries (especially to those with limited access to rabies immunoglobulin), as well as encouragement of timely (in-country) post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies and Macacine alphaherpesvirus 1 (herpesvirus B) when warranted.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Travel Medicine
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bite
  • Consultation
  • Herpesvirus B
  • Post-exposure
  • Pre-exposure
  • Prophylaxis
  • Rabies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traveller exposures to animals: A GeoSentinel analysis: A GeoSentinel analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this