The use of motion detectors to estimate net usage by householders, in relation to mosquito density in central Cote d’Ivoire: preliminary results

Benjamin G. Koudou, David Malone, Janet Hemingway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

The difficulty of accurately assessing LLIN use has led us to test electronic data logging motion detectors to provide quantitative data on household LLIN usage.

Methods

The main movements associated with an LLIN when appropriately used for malaria control were characterised under laboratory conditions. Data output from motion detectors attached to the LLINs associated with these specific movements were collated. In preliminary field studies in central Cote d’Ivoire, a pre-tested and validated questionnaire was used to identify the number of days householders claimed to have slept under LLINs. This information was compared to data downloaded from the motion detectors.

Results

Output data recording movement on the x, y, and z axes from the data loggers was consistently associated with the specific net movements. Recall of LLIN usage reported by questionnaires after a week was overestimated by 13.6%. This increased to 22.8% after 2 weeks and 38.7% after a month compared to information from the data loggers. Rates of LLIN use were positively correlated with An.gambiae s.s biting density (LRT = 273.70; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study showed that motion detectors can be used to provide a useful quantitative record of LLIN use. This new methodology provides a supplementary means of surveying bed net usage.

Original languageEnglish
Article number96
Pages (from-to)e96
JournalParasites and Vectors
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Central Cote d'Ivoire
  • Data loggers
  • Mosquitoes
  • Net usage
  • Tied
  • Untied
  • Unused

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of motion detectors to estimate net usage by householders, in relation to mosquito density in central Cote d’Ivoire: preliminary results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this