TY - JOUR
T1 - The household-level economics of using permethrin-treated bed nets to prevent malaria in children less than five years of age
AU - Meltzer, Martin I.
AU - Terlouw, Anja
AU - Kolczak, Margarette S.
AU - Odhacha, Amos
AU - Ter Kuile, Feiko
AU - Vulule, John M.
AU - Alaii, Jane A.
AU - Nahlen, Bernard L.
AU - Hawley, William A.
AU - Phillips-Howard, Penelope
PY - 2003/4/1
Y1 - 2003/4/1
N2 - We measured the two-week household-level economic impact of insecticide (permethrin)-treated bed nets (ITNs) used to prevent malaria among children less than five years of age in Asembo, Kenya. The ITNs induced a two-week reduction of 15 Kenyan shillings (KSH) (U.S. $0.25; P < 0.0001) in health care expenditures, but a statistically insignificant 0.5 day (P = 0.280) reduction in household time lost due to caring for sick children. The equivalent annual threshold cost was estimated at U.S. $6.50 (95% confidence interval = 3.12-9.86). If the actual purchase price and maintenance costs of ITNs were greater than this threshold, then households would pay more than they would save (and vice-versa). Both seasonal effects and number of children per household had larger impacts than ITNs on health care expenditures and time lost from household activities. Health care expenditures by a household without ITNs and one child were only 32 KSH per two weeks (U.S. $0.50; P = 0.002), leaving little opportunity for household-level, ITN-induced direct savings. The widespread adoption of the ITNs will therefore probably require a subsidy.
AB - We measured the two-week household-level economic impact of insecticide (permethrin)-treated bed nets (ITNs) used to prevent malaria among children less than five years of age in Asembo, Kenya. The ITNs induced a two-week reduction of 15 Kenyan shillings (KSH) (U.S. $0.25; P < 0.0001) in health care expenditures, but a statistically insignificant 0.5 day (P = 0.280) reduction in household time lost due to caring for sick children. The equivalent annual threshold cost was estimated at U.S. $6.50 (95% confidence interval = 3.12-9.86). If the actual purchase price and maintenance costs of ITNs were greater than this threshold, then households would pay more than they would save (and vice-versa). Both seasonal effects and number of children per household had larger impacts than ITNs on health care expenditures and time lost from household activities. Health care expenditures by a household without ITNs and one child were only 32 KSH per two weeks (U.S. $0.50; P = 0.002), leaving little opportunity for household-level, ITN-induced direct savings. The widespread adoption of the ITNs will therefore probably require a subsidy.
U2 - 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.68.149
DO - 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.68.149
M3 - Article
VL - 68
SP - 149
EP - 160
JO - The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
JF - The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
IS - 4 SUPPL.
ER -