Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data

  • N. M. Anstey
  • , R. N. Price
  • , T. M.E. Davis
  • , H. A. Karunajeewa
  • , I. Mueller
  • , U. D'Alessandro
  • , A. Massougbodji
  • , F. Nikiema
  • , J. B. Ouédraogo
  • , H. Tinto
  • , I. Zongo
  • , A. Same-Ekobo
  • , M. Koné
  • , H. Menan
  • , W. Yavo
  • , A. O. Touré
  • , P. E. Kofoed
  • , B. H. Alemayehu
  • , D. Jima
  • , E. Baudin
  • E. Espié, C. Nabasumba, L. Pinoges, B. Schramm, M. Cot, P. Deloron, J. F. Faucher, J. P. Guthmann, B. Lell, S. Borrmann, G. O. Adjei, J. Ursing, E. Tjitra, K. Marsh, J. Peshu, E. Juma, B. R. Ogutu, S. A. Omar, P. Sawa, A. O. Talisuna, M. Khanthavong, M. Mayxay, P. N. Newton, P. Piola, A. A. Djimdé, O. K. Doumbo, B. Fofana, I. Sagara, Sarah Staedke, Steve Ward
  • Charles Darwin University
  • Infectious Diseases Data Observatory
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Western Australia
  • Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
  • Western Health
  • Center de Recerca en Salut Internacional de Barcelona
  • Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
  • Medical Research Council Laboratories Gambia
  • Université d'Abomey-Calavi
  • Centre national de recherche scientifique et technologique, Burkina Faso
  • Centre MURAZ
  • Université de Yaoundé I
  • Université de Cocody Abidjan
  • National Institute of Public Health
  • Institut Pasteur de Côte d'Ivoire
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Projecto de Saúde de Bandim
  • International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs
  • Federal Ministry of Health, Ethiopia
  • Epicentre
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Institut de recherche pour le développement
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Université de Franche-Comté
  • Institut de veille sanitaire
  • Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné
  • University of Tübingen
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • University of Ghana
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Ministry of Health, Indonesia
  • International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi
  • Centre of Malariology
  • Lao PDR
  • National University of Laos
  • Institut Pasteur de Madagascar
  • Université de Bamako
  • Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria, although treatment failures occur in some regions. We investigated the effect of dosing strategy on efficacy in a pooled analysis from trials done in a wide range of malaria-endemic settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for clinical trials that enrolled and treated patients with artemether-lumefantrine and were published from 1960 to December, 2012. We merged individual patient data from these trials by use of standardised methods. The primary endpoint was the PCR-adjusted risk of Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence by day 28. Secondary endpoints consisted of the PCR-adjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, PCR-unadjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, early parasite clearance, and gametocyte carriage. Risk factors for PCR-adjusted recrudescence were identified using Cox's regression model with frailty shared across the study sites. Findings: We included 61 studies done between January, 1998, and December, 2012, and included 14 327 patients in our analyses. The PCR-adjusted therapeutic efficacy was 97·6% (95% CI 97·4-97·9) at day 28 and 96·0% (95·6-96·5) at day 42. After controlling for age and parasitaemia, patients prescribed a higher dose of artemether had a lower risk of having parasitaemia on day 1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·86-0·99 for every 1 mg/kg increase in daily artemether dose; p=0·024), but not on day 2 (p=0·69) or day 3 (0·087). In Asia, children weighing 10-15 kg who received a total lumefantrine dose less than 60 mg/kg had the lowest PCR-adjusted efficacy (91·7%, 95% CI 86·5-96·9). In Africa, the risk of treatment failure was greatest in malnourished children aged 1-3 years (PCR-adjusted efficacy 94·3%, 95% CI 92·3-96·3). A higher artemether dose was associated with a lower gametocyte presence within 14 days of treatment (adjusted OR 0·92, 95% CI 0·85-0·99; p=0·037 for every 1 mg/kg increase in total artemether dose). Interpretation: The recommended dose of artemether-lumefantrine provides reliable efficacy in most patients with uncomplicated malaria. However, therapeutic efficacy was lowest in young children from Asia and young underweight children from Africa; a higher dose regimen should be assessed in these groups. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-702
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet. Infectious diseases
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this