Systematic review of the prevalence of Long Covid

Mirembe Woodrow, Charles Carey, Nida Ziauddeen, Rebecca Thomas, Athena Akrami, Vittoria Lutje, Darren C Greenwood, Nisreen A Alwan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

Long COVID occurs in those infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whose symptoms persist or develop beyond the acute phase. We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms, functional disability, or pathological changes in adults or children at least 12 weeks postinfection.

Methods

We searched key registers and databases from January 1, 2020 to November 2, 2021, limited to publications in English and studies with at least 100 participants. Studies in which all participants were critically ill were excluded. Long COVID was extracted as prevalence of at least 1 symptom or pathology, or prevalence of the most common symptom or pathology, at 12 weeks or later. Heterogeneity was quantified in absolute terms and as a proportion of total variation and explored across predefined subgroups (PROSPERO ID CRD42020218351).

Results

One hundred twenty studies in 130 publications were included. Length of follow-up varied between 12 weeks and 12 months. Few studies had low risk of bias. All complete and subgroup analyses except 1 had I2 ≥90%, with prevalence of persistent symptoms range of 0%–93% (pooled estimate [PE], 42.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 6.8% to 87.9%). Studies using routine healthcare records tended to report lower prevalence (PE, 13.6%; PI, 1.2% to 68%) of persistent symptoms/pathology than self-report (PE, 43.9%; PI, 8.2% to 87.2%). However, studies systematically investigating pathology in all participants at follow up tended to report the highest estimates of all 3 (PE, 51.7%; PI, 12.3% to 89.1%). Studies of hospitalized cases had generally higher estimates than community-based studies.

Conclusions

The way in which Long COVID is defined and measured affects prevalence estimation. Given the widespread nature of SARS-CoV-2 infection globally, the burden of chronic illness is likely to be substantial even using the most conservative estimates.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberofad233
Pages (from-to)eofad233
JournalOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume10
Issue number7
Early online date3 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Long COVID
  • prevalence
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of the prevalence of Long Covid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this