TY - JOUR
T1 - Strain Characterisation for Measuring Bioefficacy of ITNs Treated with Two Active Ingredients (Dual-AI ITNs): Developing a Robust Protocol by Building Consensus
AU - Lees, Rosemary
AU - Armistead, Jennifer S.
AU - Azizi, Salum
AU - Constant, Edi
AU - Fornadel, Christen
AU - Gimnig, John E.
AU - Hemingway, Janet
AU - Impoinvil, Daniel
AU - Irish, Seth R.
AU - Kisinza, William
AU - Lissenden, Natalie
AU - Mawejje, Henry D.
AU - Messenger, Louisa A.
AU - Moore, Sarah
AU - Ngufor, Corine
AU - Oxborough, Richard
AU - Protopopoff, Natacha
AU - Ranson, Hilary
AU - Small, Graham
AU - Wagman, Joseph
AU - Weetman, David
AU - Zohdy, Sarah
AU - Spiers, Gus
PY - 2022/5/6
Y1 - 2022/5/6
N2 - Durability monitoring of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) containing a pyrethroid in combination with a second active ingredient (AI) must be adapted so that the insecticidal bioefficacy of each AI can be monitored independently. An effective way to do this is to measure rapid knock down of a pyrethroid-susceptible strain of mosquitoes to assess the bioefficacy of the pyrethroid component and to use a pyrethroid-resistant strain to measure the bioefficacy of the second ingredient. To allow robust comparison of results across tests within and between test facilities, and over time, protocols for bioefficacy testing must include either characterisation of the resistant strain, standardisation of the mosquitoes used for bioassays, or a combination of the two. Through a series of virtual meetings, key stakeholders and practitioners explored different approaches to achieving these goals. Via an iterative process we decided on the preferred approach and produced a protocol consisting of characterising mosquitoes used for bioefficacy testing before and after a round of bioassays, for example at each time point in a durability monitoring study. We present the final protocol and justify our approach to establishing a standard methodology for durability monitoring of ITNs containing pyrethroid and a second AI.
AB - Durability monitoring of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) containing a pyrethroid in combination with a second active ingredient (AI) must be adapted so that the insecticidal bioefficacy of each AI can be monitored independently. An effective way to do this is to measure rapid knock down of a pyrethroid-susceptible strain of mosquitoes to assess the bioefficacy of the pyrethroid component and to use a pyrethroid-resistant strain to measure the bioefficacy of the second ingredient. To allow robust comparison of results across tests within and between test facilities, and over time, protocols for bioefficacy testing must include either characterisation of the resistant strain, standardisation of the mosquitoes used for bioassays, or a combination of the two. Through a series of virtual meetings, key stakeholders and practitioners explored different approaches to achieving these goals. Via an iterative process we decided on the preferred approach and produced a protocol consisting of characterising mosquitoes used for bioefficacy testing before and after a round of bioassays, for example at each time point in a durability monitoring study. We present the final protocol and justify our approach to establishing a standard methodology for durability monitoring of ITNs containing pyrethroid and a second AI.
KW - bioefficacy
KW - dual active ingredients (dual-AI)
KW - durability monitoring
KW - insecticide resistance
KW - insecticide-treated nets (ITN)
KW - method development
KW - mosquito
KW - product evaluation
KW - pyrethroid
KW - quality control (QC)
KW - strain characterisation
U2 - 10.3390/insects13050434
DO - 10.3390/insects13050434
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-4450
VL - 13
SP - e434
JO - Insects
JF - Insects
IS - 5
M1 - 434
ER -