Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a clinical and radiological reference standard

  • Alexander J. Stockdale
  • , Fred Fyles
  • , Catriona Farrell
  • , Joe Lewis
  • , David Barr
  • , Kathryn Haigh
  • , Michael Abouyannis
  • , Beth Hankinson
  • , Diana Penha
  • , Rashika Fernando
  • , Rebecca Wiles
  • , Sheetal Sharma
  • , Nuria Santamaria
  • , Vijay Chindambaram
  • , Cairine Probert
  • , Muhammad Shamsher Ahmed
  • , James Cruise
  • , Imogen Fordham
  • , Rory Hicks
  • , Alice Maxwell
  • Nick Moody, Tamsin Paterson, Katharine Stott, Meng San Wu, Michael Beadsworth, Stacy Todd, Elizabeth Joekes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 are important for epidemiology, clinical management, and infection control. Limitations of oro-nasopharyngeal real-time PCR sensitivity have been described based on comparisons of single tests with repeated sampling. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 PCR clinical sensitivity using a clinical and radiological reference standard. Methods: Between March-May 2020, 2060 patients underwent thoracic imaging and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Imaging was independently double- or triple-reported (if discordance) by blinded radiologists according to radiological criteria for COVID-19. We excluded asymptomatic patients and those with alternative diagnoses that could explain imaging findings. Associations with PCR-positivity were assessed with binomial logistic regression. Results: 901 patients had possible/probable imaging features and clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and 429 patients met the clinical and radiological reference case definition. SARS-CoV-2 PCR sensitivity was 68% (95% confidence interval 64–73), was highest 7-8 days after symptom onset (78% (68–88)) and was lower among current smokers (adjusted odds ratio 0.23 (0.12–0.42) p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with clinical and imaging features of COVID-19, PCR test sensitivity was 68%, and was lower among smokers; a finding that could explain observations of lower disease incidence and that warrants further validation. PCR tests should be interpreted considering imaging, symptom duration and smoking status.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-268
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume82
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Diagnostic X-Ray
  • Radiology
  • Real-time polymerase chain reaction
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Sensitivity and specificity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a clinical and radiological reference standard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this