Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of a Salmonella Paratyphi A Vaccine

  • VASP Study Team
  • , Naina McCann
  • , Margarete Paganotti Vicentine
  • , Narges Ebrahimi
  • , Melanie Greenland
  • , Brian Angus
  • , Andrea M. Collins
  • , Thomas Darton
  • , Katherine Emary
  • , Saul N. Faust
  • , Amy Flaxman
  • , Noshi Maria
  • , Christopher A. Green
  • , Claudia Juarez Molina
  • , Ravindra Paidisetti
  • , Rajeka Lazarus
  • , Grace C. Macaulay
  • , Florence McLean
  • , V. Krishna Mohan
  • , M. Gangadhara Naidu
  • Maheshi N. Ramasamy, D. Yogeswara Rao, Nisha Singh, Sophie Vernon, Young Chan Kim, Myron M. Levine, Xinxue Liu, Andrew J. Pollard
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Southampton
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Bharat Biotech International Ltd
  • University of Bristol
  • UK Health Security Agency
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A (also known as S. Paratyphi A) is responsible for more than 2 million cases of enteric fever annually. There are no licensed vaccines against S. Paratyphi A. 

METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated an orally administered live, attenuated S. Paratyphi A vaccine (CVD 1902) using a controlled human infection model. Healthy U.K. adults were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of CVD 1902 or placebo 14 days apart. Twenty-eight days after the second dose, participants were challenged orally with S. Paratyphi A. The primary end point was a diagnosis of S. Paratyphi A infection within 14 days after challenge. Secondary end points included safety and immunogenicity. 

RESULTS: A total of 72 participants underwent randomization, of whom 34 in the CVD 1902 group and 36 in the placebo group were challenged with S. Paratyphi A. The median age of the participants was 32 years (range, 20 to 54), and 46% were women. The number of adverse events was generally similar in the two groups, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were identified. CVD 1902 induced serum IgG and IgA responses to the O antigen of S. Paratyphi A. No increases in serum IgG or IgA titers occurred in the placebo group. In the intention-to-treat population, an S. Paratyphi A infection was diagnosed within 14 days after challenge in 21% of the participants in the CVD 1902 group and in 75% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001), resulting in a vaccine efficacy of 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46 to 86). The vaccine efficacy was 69% (95% CI, 42 to 84) in the per-protocol analysis. 

CONCLUSIONS: In healthy U.K. adults who were challenged with S. Paratyphi A in a controlled human infection model, a two-dose series of CVD 1902 led to protection against S. Paratyphi A infection without safety concerns. (Funded by the Medical Research Council; VASP ISRCTN Registry number, 15485902.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1704-1714
Number of pages11
JournalThe New England journal of medicine
Volume393
Issue number17
Early online date29 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bacterial Infections
  • Global Health
  • Infectious Disease
  • Infectious Disease General
  • Vaccines

Themes

  • Innovation to Impact: Therapeutics, Diagnostics, Vaccines
  • Tuberculosis and Antimicrobial Resistance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of a Salmonella Paratyphi A Vaccine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this