Recovering from COVID-19: lessons learnt from an intensive secondary care follow-up service.

Kartik Kumar, Prashanthi Ratnakumar, Piera Ricci, Mustafa Al-Zubaidy, Karthikan Srikanthan, Shweta Agrawal, Iman Ahmedani, Isobel Baxter, Enrique Monem, Meg Coleman, Sarah L Elkin, Onn Min Kon, Patrick Mallia, Jamilah Meghji, Clare Ross, Georgina K Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In response to the first COVID-19 surge in 2020, secondary care outpatient services were rapidly reconfigured to provide specialist review for disease sequelae. At our institution, comprising hospitals across three sites in London, we initially implemented a COVID-19 follow-up pathway that was in line with expert opinion at the time but more intensive than initial clinical guidelines suggested. We retrospectively evaluated the resource requirements for this service, which supported 526 patients from April 2020 to October 2020. At the 6-week review, 193/403 (47.9%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 46/336 (13.7%) desaturated on exercise testing, 167/403 (41.4%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services and 190/403 (47.1%) needed 12-week follow-up. At the 12-week review, 113/309 (36.6%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 30/266 (11.3%) desaturated on exercise testing and 150/309 (48.5%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services. Referrals were generated to multiple medical specialties, particularly respiratory subspecialties. Our analysis allowed us to justify rationalising and streamlining provisions for subsequent COVID-19 waves while reassured that opportunities for early intervention were not being missed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-342
JournalFuture Healthcare Journal
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recovering from COVID-19: lessons learnt from an intensive secondary care follow-up service.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this