TY - JOUR
T1 - Recovering from COVID-19: lessons learnt from an intensive secondary care follow-up service.
AU - Kumar, Kartik
AU - Ratnakumar, Prashanthi
AU - Ricci, Piera
AU - Al-Zubaidy, Mustafa
AU - Srikanthan, Karthikan
AU - Agrawal, Shweta
AU - Ahmedani, Iman
AU - Baxter, Isobel
AU - Monem, Enrique
AU - Coleman, Meg
AU - Elkin, Sarah L
AU - Kon, Onn Min
AU - Mallia, Patrick
AU - Meghji, Jamilah
AU - Ross, Clare
AU - Russell, Georgina K
PY - 2022/11/30
Y1 - 2022/11/30
N2 - In response to the first COVID-19 surge in 2020, secondary care outpatient services were rapidly reconfigured to provide specialist review for disease sequelae. At our institution, comprising hospitals across three sites in London, we initially implemented a COVID-19 follow-up pathway that was in line with expert opinion at the time but more intensive than initial clinical guidelines suggested. We retrospectively evaluated the resource requirements for this service, which supported 526 patients from April 2020 to October 2020. At the 6-week review, 193/403 (47.9%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 46/336 (13.7%) desaturated on exercise testing, 167/403 (41.4%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services and 190/403 (47.1%) needed 12-week follow-up. At the 12-week review, 113/309 (36.6%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 30/266 (11.3%) desaturated on exercise testing and 150/309 (48.5%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services. Referrals were generated to multiple medical specialties, particularly respiratory subspecialties. Our analysis allowed us to justify rationalising and streamlining provisions for subsequent COVID-19 waves while reassured that opportunities for early intervention were not being missed.
AB - In response to the first COVID-19 surge in 2020, secondary care outpatient services were rapidly reconfigured to provide specialist review for disease sequelae. At our institution, comprising hospitals across three sites in London, we initially implemented a COVID-19 follow-up pathway that was in line with expert opinion at the time but more intensive than initial clinical guidelines suggested. We retrospectively evaluated the resource requirements for this service, which supported 526 patients from April 2020 to October 2020. At the 6-week review, 193/403 (47.9%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 46/336 (13.7%) desaturated on exercise testing, 167/403 (41.4%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services and 190/403 (47.1%) needed 12-week follow-up. At the 12-week review, 113/309 (36.6%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 30/266 (11.3%) desaturated on exercise testing and 150/309 (48.5%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services. Referrals were generated to multiple medical specialties, particularly respiratory subspecialties. Our analysis allowed us to justify rationalising and streamlining provisions for subsequent COVID-19 waves while reassured that opportunities for early intervention were not being missed.
U2 - 10.7861/fhj.2021-0197
DO - 10.7861/fhj.2021-0197
M3 - Article
SN - 2514-6645
SP - 335
EP - 342
JO - Future Healthcare Journal
JF - Future Healthcare Journal
ER -