Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantifying the mental health and economic impacts of prospective Universal Basic Income schemes among young people in the UK A microsimulation modelling study

  • Tao Chen
  • , Howard Reed
  • , Fiorella Parra-Mujica
  • , Elliott Aidan Johnson
  • , Matthew Johnson
  • , Martin O'Flaherty
  • , Brendan Collins
  • , Chris Kypridemos
  • University of Liverpool
  • University of York
  • Northumbria University
  • Landman Economics
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Universal Basic Income (UBI) - a largely unconditional, regular payment to all adults to support basic needs - has been proposed as a policy to increase the size and security of household incomes and promote mental health. We aimed to quantify its long-term impact on mental health among young people in England. 

Methods We produced a discrete-time dynamic stochastic microsimulation that models a close-to-reality open cohort of synthetic individuals (2010-2030) based on data from Office for National Statistics and Understanding Society. Three UBI scheme scenarios were simulated: Scheme 1 - Starter (per week): £41 per child; £63 per adult over 18 and under 65; £190 per adult aged 65+; Scheme 2 - Intermediate (per week): £63 per child; £145 per adult under 65; £190 per adult aged 65+; Scheme 3 - Minimum Income Standard level (per week): £95 per child; £230 per adult under 65; £230 per adult aged 65+. We reported cases of anxiety and depression prevented or postponed and cost savings. Estimates are rounded to the second significant digit. 

Results Scheme 1 could prevent or postpone 200 000 (95% uncertainty interval: 180 000 to 210 000) cases of anxiety and depression from 2010 to 2030. This would increase to 420 000(400 000 to 440 000) for Scheme 2 and 550 000(520 000 to 570 000) for Scheme 3. Assuming that 50% of the cases are diagnosed and treated, Scheme 1 could save £330 million (£280 million to £390 million) to National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS), over the same period, with Scheme 2 (£710 million (£640 million to £790 million)) or Scheme 3 (£930 million (£850 million to £1000 million)) producing more considerable savings. Overall, total cost savings (including NHS, PSS and patients' related costs) would range from £1.5 billion (£1.2 billion to £1.8 billion) for Scheme 1 to £4.2 billion (£3.7 billion to £4.6 billion) for Scheme 3. 

Conclusion Our modelling suggests that UBI could substantially benefit young people's mental health, producing substantial health-related cost savings.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere075831
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • anxiety disorders
  • depression & mood disorders
  • health economics
  • mental health
  • public health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the mental health and economic impacts of prospective Universal Basic Income schemes among young people in the UK A microsimulation modelling study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this