Quantifying distance overestimation from global positioning system in urban spaces

Stephen J. Mooney, Daniel M. Sheehan, Garazi Zulaika, Andrew G. Rundle, Kevin McGill, Melika R. Behrooz, Gina Schellenbaum Lovasi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate accuracy of distance measures computed from Global Positioning System (GPS) points in New York City. Methods. We performed structured walks along urban streets carrying Globalsat DG-100 GPS Data Logger devices in highest and lowest quartiles of building height and tree canopy cover. We used ArcGIS version 10.1 to select walks and compute the straight-line distance (Geographic Information System-measured) and sum of distances between consecutive GPS waypoints (GPS-measured) for each walk. Results. GPS distance overestimates were associated with building height (median overestimate = 97% for high vs 14% for low building height) and to a lesser extent tree canopy (43% for high vs 28% for low tree canopy). Conclusions. Algorithms using distances between successive GPS points to infer speed or travel mode may misclassify trips differentially by context. Researchers studying urban spaces may prefer alternative mode identification techniques.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-653
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying distance overestimation from global positioning system in urban spaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this