TY - JOUR
T1 - Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries
AU - Ghandour, Rula
AU - Shoaibi, Azza
AU - Khatib, Rana
AU - Abu Rmeileh, Niveen
AU - Unal, Belgin
AU - Sözmen, Kaan
AU - Kılıç, Bülent
AU - Fouad, Fouad
AU - Al Ali, Radwan
AU - Ben Romdhane, Habiba
AU - Aissi, Wafa
AU - Ahmad, Balsam
AU - Capewell, Simon
AU - Critchley, Julia
AU - Husseini, Abdullatif
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Objectives: To explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey.Methods: A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies.Results: Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies.Conclusions: Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed.
AB - Objectives: To explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey.Methods: A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies.Results: Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies.Conclusions: Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed.
KW - Cardiovascular diseases
KW - Decision-making process
KW - Low middle income countries
KW - Multi-criteria decision analysis
KW - Priority setting
U2 - 10.1007/s00038-014-0569-3
DO - 10.1007/s00038-014-0569-3
M3 - Article
SN - 1661-8556
VL - 60
SP - 73
EP - 81
JO - International Journal of Public Health
JF - International Journal of Public Health
IS - 1
ER -