Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi

  • Pitchaya P. Indravudh
  • , Katherine Fielding
  • , Linda A. Sande
  • , Hendramoorthy Maheswaran
  • , Saviour Mphande
  • , Moses Kumwenda
  • , Richard Chilongosi
  • , Rose Nyirenda
  • , Cheryl C. Johnson
  • , Karin Hatzold
  • , Elizabeth L. Corbett
  • , Fern Terris-Prestholt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Community-based strategies can extend coverage of HIV testing and diagnose HIV at earlier stages of infection but can be costly to implement. We evaluated the costs and effects of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Mangochi District, Malawi. Methods This economic evaluation was based within a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of 30 group village heads and their catchment areas comparing the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) versus the SOC alone. The intervention involved mobilising community health groups to lead 7-day HIVST campaigns including distribution of HIVST kits. The SOC included facility-based HIV testing services. Primary costings estimated economic costs of the intervention and SOC from the provider perspective, with costs annualised and measured in 2018 US$. A postintervention survey captured individual-level data on HIV testing events, which were combined with unit costs from primary costings, and outcomes. The incremental cost per person tested HIV-positive and associated uncertainty were estimated. Results Overall, the community-led HIVST intervention costed $138 624 or $5.70 per HIVST kit distributed, with test kits and personnel the main contributing costs. The SOC costed $263 400 or $4.57 per person tested. Individual-level provider costs were higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm (adjusted mean difference $3.77, 95% CI $2.44 to $5.10; p<0.001), while the intervention effect on HIV positivity varied based on adjustment for previous diagnosis. The incremental cost per person tested HIV positive was $324 but increased to $1312 and $985 when adjusting for previously diagnosed self-testers or self-testers on treatment, respectively. Community-led HIVST demonstrated low probability of being cost-effective against plausible willingness-to-pay values, with HIV positivity a key determinant. Conclusion Community-led HIVST can provide HIV testing at a low additional unit cost. However, adding community-led HIVST to the SOC was not likely to be cost-effective, especially in contexts with low prevalence of undiagnosed HIV. Trial registration number NCT03541382.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere004593
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cluster randomized trial
  • health economics
  • HIV
  • other diagnostic or tool

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this