Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Position statement from the Editors of Anaesthesia and Anaesthesia Reports on best practice in academic medical publishing

  • M. D. Wiles
  • , A. A. Klein
  • , C. L. Shelton
  • , S. Agarwal
  • , C. R. Bailey
  • , P. Bramley
  • , J. B. Carlisle
  • , M. Charlesworth
  • , K. El-Boghdadly
  • , M. G. Irwin
  • , E. Keane
  • , H. Laycock
  • , E. R. Mariano
  • , I. K. Moppett
  • , Benjamin Morton
  • , L. Savic
  • , A. F. Smith
  • , A. E. Vercueil
  • , N. Barnwell
  • , R. D. Guris
  • R. Kearsley, C. Lyons, Y. Metodiev, L. F. Miles, C. Thomas, M. Turner
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Sheffield
  • Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Lancaster University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is essential that academic publishing complies with the highest standards in terms of ethics, research conduct and manuscript preparation. This protects the rights and welfare of research participants, ensures the integrity of study results and aids the communication and dissemination of novel findings into clinical practice. This position statement outlines the current policies and practices of the Editors of Anaesthesia and Anaesthesia Reports in relation to academic medical publishing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1139-1146
Number of pages8
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume78
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ethics
  • position statement
  • publishing
  • research

Cite this