Abstract
Background: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. Aims: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. Method: in a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. Results: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. Conclusions: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-185 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | British Journal of Psychiatry |
| Volume | 196 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: Prospective study in 11 European countries: Prospective study in 11 European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver