Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes of switching from protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in virologically suppressed adults with nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance– a phase IV randomised, open-label study (PIBIK study)

  • Collins Iwuji
  • , Laura Waters
  • , Ana Milinkovic
  • , Chloe Orkin
  • , Julie Fox
  • , Frank Post
  • , Nicky Perry
  • , Chloe Bruce
  • , Natalie Dailey
  • , Ye To
  • , Stephen Bremner
  • , Duncan Churchill
  • , Anna Maria Geretti
  • University of Sussex
  • Africa Health Research Institute
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on how historical nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) other than M184V/I, affect the activity of B/F/TAF. We evaluated the outcomes of switching virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) individuals harbouring major RAMs from boosted protease inhibitor (bPI)-based therapy to B/F/TAF. Methods: Participants had various historical genotypic patterns including M184V/I, ≤2 thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), and other NRTI RAMs (NAMs), and no integrase resistance. Baseline RAMs were explored by retrospective sequencing of cellular HIV-1 DNA. Participants were randomised (1:1) to switching to B/F/TAF either immediately or after 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining virological suppression (pure virologic response) at week-24; secondary outcomes were proportion of participants with virological suppression at week-48, pre-specified safety measures, and treatment-emergent resistance. Results: Historically, 21/72 (29.2%) participants had M184V/I, 5 (6.9%) M184V/I + 1 NAM, 31 (43.1%) 1 TAM ± M184V/I ± 1 NAM, and 15 (20.8%) 2 TAMs ± M184V/I ± 1 NAM. At week-24, proportions maintaining virological suppression were 33/33 (100%) on B/F/TAF vs. 38/39 (97.4%) on bPI (difference 2.6%; 95% CI -2.4%, 7.5%). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 10/33 (30.3%) vs. 1/39 (2.6%), respectively. The immediate switch arm had improved lipid parameters but increased HbA1c and weight. Virological suppression was maintained at week-48. There were six discontinuations; four on B/F/TAF were drug-related and the two on bPI were not drug-related. Conclusions: Historical NRTI resistance did not compromise the effectiveness of B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed adults. 12% experienced treatment-limiting AEs after switching.

Original languageEnglish
Article number33
JournalVirology Journal
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Archive
  • Bictegravir
  • Boosted protease inhibitor
  • Drug resistance
  • HIV
  • Integrase strand transfer inhibitor
  • Tenofovir alafenamide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of switching from protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in virologically suppressed adults with nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance– a phase IV randomised, open-label study (PIBIK study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this