Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimal Dose and Safety of Intravenous Favipiravir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 A Dose-Escalating, Randomized Controlled Phase Ib Study

  • the AGILE CST-6 Study Group
  • , Tim Rowland
  • , Richard FitzGerald
  • , Elizabeth Challenger
  • , Laura Dickinson
  • , Laura J. Else
  • , Lauren Walker
  • , Colin Hale
  • , Victoria Shaw
  • , Callum Kelly
  • , Rebecca Lyon
  • , Jennifer Gibney
  • , Karim Dhamani
  • , Margaret Irwin
  • , Yvanne Enever
  • , Michelle Tetlow
  • , William Wood
  • , Helen Reynolds
  • , Justin Chiong
  • , Orod Osanlou
  • Henry Pertinez, Katie Bullock, William Greenhalf, Andrew Owen, David G. Lalloo, Michael Jacobs, Julian A. Hiscox, Thomas Jaki, Pavel Mozgunov, Geoffrey Saunders, Gareth Griffiths, Saye H. Khoo, Thomas E. Fletcher
  • University of Liverpool
  • NIHR Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Clinical Research Facility
  • PHARMExcel
  • Bangor University
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • University of Oxford
  • MRC Biostatistics Unit
  • University of Regensburg
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AGILE (NCT04746183) is a Phase Ib/IIa platform, evaluating candidates to treat COVID-19. Candidate Specific Trial 6 evaluated the safety and optimal dose of a novel intravenous formulation of favipiravir in a dose-escalating, open-label, randomized, controlled, Bayesian adaptive Phase Ib trial. Hospitalized adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, within 14 days of symptomatic COVID-19 were randomized 2:1 in groups of 6 (n = 4 favipiravir, n = 2 standard of care) to ascending doses of intravenous favipiravir twice daily (b.i.d.) for 7 days or standard of care. Clinical data, safety evaluations, virology and pharmacokinetic samples were collected. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included clinical, pharmacokinetic and virological endpoints. Twenty-four participants enrolled between September 10, 2022 and November 1, 2023 [10/24 female; median age 74 years (range 52–93)]. Favipiravir was well tolerated despite a high background rate of unrelated adverse events. No dose limiting toxicities were observed, with a model-predicted dose limiting toxicity risk of 16.8% and probability of unacceptable toxicity of 2.7% at the highest dose level. No serious adverse events were deemed related to favipiravir but an expected association with asymptomatic, transient hyperuricemia was observed. Favipiravir exposures increased disproportionally to dose with significant accumulation in plasma, but with marked variability between participants within each cohort. This novel formulation of favipiravir was safe at sustained high doses that reached pre-specified pharmacokinetic targets in a study group with frailty and complex health profiles. We consider doses up to 2,400 mg b.i.d. to be safe for further evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal Dose and Safety of Intravenous Favipiravir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 A Dose-Escalating, Randomized Controlled Phase Ib Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this