TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter Diagnostic Evaluation of a Novel Coronavirus Antigen Lateral Flow Test among Symptomatic Individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom
AU - Faffe, Debora S.
AU - Byrne, Rachel
AU - Body, Richard
AU - Castiñeiras, Terezinha Marta P.
AU - Castiñeiras, Anna P.
AU - Finch, Lorna
AU - Kontogianni, Nadia
AU - Bengey, Daisy
AU - Galliez, Rafael Mello
AU - Ferreira, Orlando C.
AU - Mariani, Diana
AU - da Silva, Bianca Ortiz
AU - Ribeiro, Sabrina Santana
AU - de Vos, Margaretha
AU - Escadafal, Camille
AU - Adams, Emily
AU - Tanuri, Amilcar
AU - Cubas Atienzar, Ana I.
AU - Allen, Joy
AU - Braybrook, Julian
AU - Buckle, Peter
AU - Dark, Paul
AU - Davis, Kerrie
AU - Gordon, Adam
AU - Halstead, Anna
AU - Harden, Charlotte
AU - Inkson, Colette
AU - Jones, Naoko
AU - Jones, William
AU - Lasserson, Dan
AU - Lee, Joseph
AU - Lendrem, Clare
AU - Lewington, Andrew
AU - Logan, Mary
AU - Micocci, Massimo
AU - Nicholson, Brian
AU - Perera-Salazar, Rafael
AU - Prestwich, Graham
AU - Price, D. Ashley
AU - Reynard, Charles
AU - Riley, Beverley
AU - Simpson, John
AU - Tate, Valerie
AU - Turner, Philip
AU - Wilcox, Mark
AU - Zhifang, Melody
AU - Bengey, Daisy
AU - Edwards, Thomas
AU - Williams, Chris
AU - Wooding, Dom
PY - 2022/12/21
Y1 - 2022/12/21
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the commercialization of many antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), requiring independent evaluations. This report describes the clinical evaluation of the Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Antigen Test (Colloidal Gold) (Beijing Hotgen Biotech Co., Ltd.), at two sites within Brazil and one in the United Kingdom. The collected samples (446 nasal swabs from Brazil and 246 nasopharyngeal samples from the UK) were analyzed by the Ag-RDT and compared to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Analytical evaluation of the Ag-RDT was performed using direct culture supernatants of SARS-CoV-2 strains from the wild-type (B.1), Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), Gamma (P.1), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) lineages. An overall sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.3 to 93.3) and 100.0% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100.0), respectively, were obtained for the Brazilian and UK cohorts. The analytical limit of detection was determined as 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Alpha), 2.5 × 102 PFU/mL (Delta), 2.5 × 103 PFU/mL (Gamma), and 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Omicron), giving a viral copy equivalent of approximately 2.1 × 104 copies/mL, 9.0 × 105 copies/mL, 1.7 × 106 copies/mL, and 1.8 × 105 copies/mL for the Ag-RDT, respectively. Overall, while a higher sensitivity was claimed by the manufacturers than that found in this study, this evaluation finds that the Ag-RDT meets the WHO minimum performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 Ag-RDTs. This study illustrates the comparative performance of the Hotgen Ag-RDT across two global settings and considers the different approaches in evaluation methods.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the commercialization of many antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), requiring independent evaluations. This report describes the clinical evaluation of the Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Antigen Test (Colloidal Gold) (Beijing Hotgen Biotech Co., Ltd.), at two sites within Brazil and one in the United Kingdom. The collected samples (446 nasal swabs from Brazil and 246 nasopharyngeal samples from the UK) were analyzed by the Ag-RDT and compared to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Analytical evaluation of the Ag-RDT was performed using direct culture supernatants of SARS-CoV-2 strains from the wild-type (B.1), Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), Gamma (P.1), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) lineages. An overall sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.3 to 93.3) and 100.0% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100.0), respectively, were obtained for the Brazilian and UK cohorts. The analytical limit of detection was determined as 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Alpha), 2.5 × 102 PFU/mL (Delta), 2.5 × 103 PFU/mL (Gamma), and 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Omicron), giving a viral copy equivalent of approximately 2.1 × 104 copies/mL, 9.0 × 105 copies/mL, 1.7 × 106 copies/mL, and 1.8 × 105 copies/mL for the Ag-RDT, respectively. Overall, while a higher sensitivity was claimed by the manufacturers than that found in this study, this evaluation finds that the Ag-RDT meets the WHO minimum performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 Ag-RDTs. This study illustrates the comparative performance of the Hotgen Ag-RDT across two global settings and considers the different approaches in evaluation methods.
KW - Ag-RDT
KW - COVID-19
KW - diagnostics
KW - LFA
KW - SARS-CoV-2
U2 - 10.1128/spectrum.02012-22
DO - 10.1128/spectrum.02012-22
M3 - Article
SN - 2165-0497
VL - 10
SP - e02012-22
JO - Microbiology spectrum
JF - Microbiology spectrum
IS - 6
ER -