Multicenter Diagnostic Evaluation of a Novel Coronavirus Antigen Lateral Flow Test among Symptomatic Individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom

Debora S. Faffe, Rachel Byrne, Richard Body, Terezinha Marta P. Castiñeiras, Anna P. Castiñeiras, Lorna Finch, Nadia Kontogianni, Daisy Bengey, Rafael Mello Galliez, Orlando C. Ferreira, Diana Mariani, Bianca Ortiz da Silva, Sabrina Santana Ribeiro, Margaretha de Vos, Camille Escadafal, Emily Adams, Amilcar Tanuri, Ana I. Cubas Atienzar, Joy Allen, Julian BraybrookPeter Buckle, Paul Dark, Kerrie Davis, Adam Gordon, Anna Halstead, Charlotte Harden, Colette Inkson, Naoko Jones, William Jones, Dan Lasserson, Joseph Lee, Clare Lendrem, Andrew Lewington, Mary Logan, Massimo Micocci, Brian Nicholson, Rafael Perera-Salazar, Graham Prestwich, D. Ashley Price, Charles Reynard, Beverley Riley, John Simpson, Valerie Tate, Philip Turner, Mark Wilcox, Melody Zhifang, Daisy Bengey, Thomas Edwards, Chris Williams, Dom Wooding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the commercialization of many antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), requiring independent evaluations. This report describes the clinical evaluation of the Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Antigen Test (Colloidal Gold) (Beijing Hotgen Biotech Co., Ltd.), at two sites within Brazil and one in the United Kingdom. The collected samples (446 nasal swabs from Brazil and 246 nasopharyngeal samples from the UK) were analyzed by the Ag-RDT and compared to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Analytical evaluation of the Ag-RDT was performed using direct culture supernatants of SARS-CoV-2 strains from the wild-type (B.1), Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), Gamma (P.1), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) lineages. An overall sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.3 to 93.3) and 100.0% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100.0), respectively, were obtained for the Brazilian and UK cohorts. The analytical limit of detection was determined as 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Alpha), 2.5 × 102 PFU/mL (Delta), 2.5 × 103 PFU/mL (Gamma), and 1.0 × 103 PFU/mL (Omicron), giving a viral copy equivalent of approximately 2.1 × 104 copies/mL, 9.0 × 105 copies/mL, 1.7 × 106 copies/mL, and 1.8 × 105 copies/mL for the Ag-RDT, respectively. Overall, while a higher sensitivity was claimed by the manufacturers than that found in this study, this evaluation finds that the Ag-RDT meets the WHO minimum performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 Ag-RDTs. This study illustrates the comparative performance of the Hotgen Ag-RDT across two global settings and considers the different approaches in evaluation methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e02012-22
JournalMicrobiology spectrum
Volume10
Issue number6
Early online date30 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Ag-RDT
  • COVID-19
  • diagnostics
  • LFA
  • SARS-CoV-2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter Diagnostic Evaluation of a Novel Coronavirus Antigen Lateral Flow Test among Symptomatic Individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this