Molecular markers of reduced behavioral sensitivity to transfluthrin in Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Western Kenya

Background: The emergence and spread of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors threatens vector control efforts. The use of spatial repellent products (SR) containing volatile insecticides such as transfluthrin offer a promising complementary strategy to current vector control tools. Here, we employed whole transcriptome analysis to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying reduced behavioral sensitivity to transfluthrin in two pyrethroid-resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Using a high-throughput screening system (HITSS), we evaluated 600 mosquitoes across three populations (Bungoma field population, the insecticide-resistant Pimperena lab strain, and the susceptible Kisumu lab strain), categorizing them as responders or non-responders based on their SR avoidance behavior. Non-responders exhibited significantly reduced repellency (spatial activity index < 0.1) at standard transfluthrin concentrations (0.0025 μg/ml). Results: RNA sequencing of pooled samples (n = 10 mosquitoes per pool, three replicates per condition) revealed distinct transcriptional profiles between responders and non-responders. The cytochrome P450 gene CYP12F12 showed significant overexpression (FC = 36.6389, p < 0.001) in Bungoma non-responders, suggesting its potential role in transfluthrin metabolism. Additionally, we observed population-specific distributions of voltage-gated sodium channel mutations, with fixation of kdr L995F in Pimperena non-responders and elevated frequency (80–100%) of kdr L995S in Bungoma non-responders. Conclusions: These findings provide the first molecular evidence linking both metabolic and target-site mechanisms to reduced behavioral sensitivity to transfluthrin in malaria vectors. The co-occurrence of CYP12F12 overexpression and kdr mutations suggests multiple resistance mechanisms may affect spatial repellent efficacy, highlighting the need for resistance monitoring in spatial repellent deployment strategies.