Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for critically ill patients with COVID-19: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial

  • Yaseen M. Arabi
  • , Anthony C. Gordon
  • , Lennie P.G. Derde
  • , Alistair D. Nichol
  • , Srinivas Murthy
  • , Farah Al Beidh
  • , Djillali Annane
  • , Lolowa Al Swaidan
  • , Abi Beane
  • , Richard Beasley
  • , Lindsay R. Berry
  • , Zahra Bhimani
  • , Marc J.M. Bonten
  • , Charlotte A. Bradbury
  • , Frank M. Brunkhorst
  • , Meredith Buxton
  • , Adrian Buzgau
  • , Allen Cheng
  • , Menno De Jong
  • , Michelle A. Detry
  • Eamon J. Duffy, Lise J. Estcourt, Mark Fitzgerald, Rob Fowler, Timothy D. Girard, Ewan C. Goligher, Herman Goossens, Rashan Haniffa, Alisa M. Higgins, Thomas E. Hills, Christopher M. Horvat, David T. Huang, Andrew J. King, Francois Lamontagne, Patrick R. Lawler, Roger Lewis, Kelsey Linstrum, Edward Litton, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Salim Malakouti, Daniel F. McAuley, Anna McGlothlin, Shay Mcguinness, Bryan J. McVerry, Stephanie K. Montgomery, Susan C. Morpeth, Paul R. Mouncey, Katrina Orr, Rachael Parke, Olly Hamilton
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
  • Imperial College London
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Utrecht University
  • University College Dublin
  • Monash University
  • Alfred Health
  • University of British Columbia
  • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • ANR-18-RHUS60004
  • University of Oxford
  • Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
  • Berry Consultants
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Bristol
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Global Coalition for Adaptive Research
  • Academic Medical Center
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • NHS Blood and Transplant
  • Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Antwerp
  • National Intensive Care Surveillance-Mahidol Oxford Research Unit
  • University College Hospital
  • Université de Sherbrooke
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
  • Peter Munk Cardiac Centre
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • St John of God Health Care
  • University of Western Australia
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast
  • Middlemore Hospital
  • Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre
  • The University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To study the efficacy of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: Critically ill adults with COVID-19 were randomized to receive lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, combination therapy of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine or no antiviral therapy (control). The primary endpoint was an ordinal scale of organ support-free days. Analyses used a Bayesian cumulative logistic model and expressed treatment effects as an adjusted odds ratio (OR) where an OR > 1 is favorable. Results: We randomized 694 patients to receive lopinavir-ritonavir (n = 255), hydroxychloroquine (n = 50), combination therapy (n = 27) or control (n = 362). The median organ support-free days among patients in lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, and combination therapy groups was 4 (– 1 to 15), 0 (– 1 to 9) and—1 (– 1 to 7), respectively, compared to 6 (– 1 to 16) in the control group with in-hospital mortality of 88/249 (35%), 17/49 (35%), 13/26 (50%), respectively, compared to 106/353 (30%) in the control group. The three interventions decreased organ support-free days compared to control (OR [95% credible interval]: 0.73 [0.55, 0.99], 0.57 [0.35, 0.83] 0.41 [0.24, 0.72]), yielding posterior probabilities that reached the threshold futility (≥ 99.0%), and high probabilities of harm (98.0%, 99.9% and > 99.9%, respectively). The three interventions reduced hospital survival compared with control (OR [95% CrI]: 0.65 [0.45, 0.95], 0.56 [0.30, 0.89], and 0.36 [0.17, 0.73]), yielding high probabilities of harm (98.5% and 99.4% and 99.8%, respectively). Conclusion: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19, lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, or combination therapy worsened outcomes compared to no antiviral therapy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-886
Number of pages20
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume47
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Adaptive platform trial
  • COVID-19
  • Hydroxychloroquine
  • Intensive care
  • Lopinavir-ritonavir
  • Pandemic
  • Pneumonia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for critically ill patients with COVID-19: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this