TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term efficacy and safety of a treatment strategy for HIV infection using protease inhibitor monotherapy: 8-year routine clinical care follow-up from a randomised, controlled, open-label pragmatic trial (PIVOT): 8-year routine clinical care follow-up from a randomised, controlled, open-label pragmatic trial (PIVOT)
AU - Paton, Nicholas I.
AU - Stöhr, Wolfgang
AU - Arenas-Pinto, Alejandro
AU - Clarke, Amanda
AU - Williams, Ian
AU - Johnson, Margaret
AU - Orkin, Chloe
AU - Chen, Fabian
AU - Lee, Vincent
AU - Winston, Alan
AU - Gompels, Mark
AU - Fox, Julie
AU - Sanders, Karen
AU - Dunn, David T.
AU - Fisher, Martin
AU - Hadley, Wendy
AU - Stacey, David
AU - Byrne, Pat
AU - De Esteban, Nahum
AU - Pellegrino, Pierre
AU - Haddow, Lewis
AU - Hand, James
AU - De Souza, Carl
AU - Murthen, Lisa
AU - Crawford-Jones, Andrew
AU - Wilson, Ruth
AU - Green, Elizabeth
AU - Masterson, John
AU - Patel, Kamlesh
AU - Howe, Rebecca
AU - Mullaney, Scott
AU - Jennings, Louise
AU - Beeching, Nicholas
AU - Tamaklo, Rebecca
AU - Teague, Alistair
AU - Jendrulek, Isabelle
AU - Tiraboschi, Juan Manuel
AU - Wilkins, Ed
AU - Clowes, Yvonne
AU - Thompson, Andrew
AU - Brook, Gary
AU - Trivedi, Manoj
AU - Aderogba, Kazeem
AU - Jones, Martin
AU - DeBurgh-Thomas, Andrew
AU - Jones, Liz
AU - Reeves, Iain
AU - Mguni, Sifiso
AU - Chadwick, David
AU - Lalloo, David
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Background: Treatment-simplification strategies are important tools for patient-centred management. We evaluated long-term outcomes from a PI monotherapy switch strategy. Methods: Eligible participants attending 43 UK treatment centres had a viral load (VL) below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks on combination ART. Participants were randomised to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or switch to a strategy of physician-selected PI monotherapy (PI-mono) with prompt return to combination therapy if VL rebounded. The primary outcome, previously reported, was loss of future drug options after 3 years, defined as new intermediate/high level resistance to at least one drug to which the participant's virus was considered sensitive at trial entry. Here we report resistance and disease outcomes after further extended follow-up in routine care. The study was registered as ISRCTN04857074. Findings: We randomised 587 participants to OT (291) or PI-mono (296) between Nov 4, 2008, and July 28, 2010 and followed them for a median of more than 8 years (100 months) until 2018. At the end of this follow-up time, one or more future drug options had been lost in 7 participants in the OT group and 6 in the PI-mono group; estimated cumulative risk by 8 years of 2.7% and 2.1% respectively (difference −0.6%, 95% CI −3.2% to 2.0%). Only one PI-mono participant developed resistance to the protease inhibitor they were taking (atazanavir). Serious clinical events (death, serious AIDS, and serious non-AIDS) were infrequent; reported in a total of 12 (4.1%) participants in the OT group and 23 (7.8%) in the PI-mono group (P = 0.08) over the entire follow-up period. Interpretation: A strategy of PI monotherapy, with regular VL monitoring and prompt reintroduction of combination treatment following rebound, preserved future treatment options. Findings confirm the high genetic barrier to resistance of the PI drug class that makes them well suited for creative, patient-centred, treatment-simplification approaches. The possibility of a small excess risk of serious clinical events with the PI monotherapy strategy cannot be excluded. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
AB - Background: Treatment-simplification strategies are important tools for patient-centred management. We evaluated long-term outcomes from a PI monotherapy switch strategy. Methods: Eligible participants attending 43 UK treatment centres had a viral load (VL) below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks on combination ART. Participants were randomised to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or switch to a strategy of physician-selected PI monotherapy (PI-mono) with prompt return to combination therapy if VL rebounded. The primary outcome, previously reported, was loss of future drug options after 3 years, defined as new intermediate/high level resistance to at least one drug to which the participant's virus was considered sensitive at trial entry. Here we report resistance and disease outcomes after further extended follow-up in routine care. The study was registered as ISRCTN04857074. Findings: We randomised 587 participants to OT (291) or PI-mono (296) between Nov 4, 2008, and July 28, 2010 and followed them for a median of more than 8 years (100 months) until 2018. At the end of this follow-up time, one or more future drug options had been lost in 7 participants in the OT group and 6 in the PI-mono group; estimated cumulative risk by 8 years of 2.7% and 2.1% respectively (difference −0.6%, 95% CI −3.2% to 2.0%). Only one PI-mono participant developed resistance to the protease inhibitor they were taking (atazanavir). Serious clinical events (death, serious AIDS, and serious non-AIDS) were infrequent; reported in a total of 12 (4.1%) participants in the OT group and 23 (7.8%) in the PI-mono group (P = 0.08) over the entire follow-up period. Interpretation: A strategy of PI monotherapy, with regular VL monitoring and prompt reintroduction of combination treatment following rebound, preserved future treatment options. Findings confirm the high genetic barrier to resistance of the PI drug class that makes them well suited for creative, patient-centred, treatment-simplification approaches. The possibility of a small excess risk of serious clinical events with the PI monotherapy strategy cannot be excluded. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
KW - Darunavir
KW - HIV
KW - Protease inhibitor monotherapy
KW - Randomised
KW - Simplification
U2 - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102457
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102457
M3 - Article
SN - 2589-5370
VL - 69
JO - eClinicalMedicine
JF - eClinicalMedicine
M1 - 102457
ER -