Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

It depends on how you tell: a qualitative diagnostic analysis of the implementation climate for community-wide mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminth

  • Euripide Avokpaho
  • , Sarah Lawrence
  • , Amy Roll
  • , Angelin Titus
  • , Yesudoss Jacob
  • , Saravanakumar Puthupalayam Kaliappan
  • , Marie Claire Gwayi-Chore
  • , Félicien Chabi
  • , Comlanvi Innocent Togbevi
  • , Abiguel Belou Elijan
  • , Providence Nindi
  • , Judd L. Walson
  • , Sitara Swarna Rao Ajjampur
  • , Moudachirou Ibikounle
  • , Khumbo Kalua
  • , Kumudha Aruldas
  • , Arianna Rubin Means
  • Institut de Recherche Cliniques du Benin (IRCB)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • University of Washington
  • The DeWorm3 Project
  • Christian Medical College
  • Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach
  • Université d'Abomey-Calavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Current soil-transmitted helminth (STH) morbidity control guidelines primarily target deworming of preschool and school-age children. Emerging evidence suggests that community-wide mass drug administration (cMDA) may interrupt STH transmission. However, the success of such programmes depends on achieving high treatment coverage and uptake. This formative analysis was conducted to evaluate the implementation climate for cMDA and to determine barriers and facilitators to launch. Settings Prior to the launch of a cMDA trial in Benin, India and Malawi. 

Participants Community members (adult women and men, children, and local leaders), community drug distributors (CDDs) and health facility workers. Design We conducted 48 focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members, 13 FGDs with CDDs and 5 FGDs with health facility workers in twelve randomly selected clusters across the three study countries. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide the design of the interview guide and thematic analysis. 

Results Across all three sites, aspects of the implementation climate that were facilitators to cMDA launch included: high community member demand for cMDA, integration of cMDA into existing vaccination campaigns and/or health services, and engagement with familiar health workers. Barriers to launching cMDA included mistrust towards medical interventions, fear of side effects and limited perceived need for interrupting STH transmission. We include specific recommendations from community members regarding cMDA distribution sites, personnel requirements, delivery timing and incentives, leaders to engage and methods for mobilising participants. 

Conclusions Prior to launching the cMDA programme as an alternative to school-based MDA, cMDA was found to be generally acceptable across diverse geographical and demographic settings. Community members, CDDs and health workers felt that engaging communities and tailoring programmes to the local context are critical for success. Potential barriers may be mitigated by identifying local concerns and addressing them via targeted community sensitisation prior to implementation. Trial registration number NCT03014167; Pre-results.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere061682
JournalBMJ Open
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • community child health
  • public health
  • qualitative research
  • tropical medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It depends on how you tell: a qualitative diagnostic analysis of the implementation climate for community-wide mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this