Is it better to use episiotomy as needed, or routinely? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review

LSTM International Public Health

Is it better to use episiotomy as needed, or routinely? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review

LSTM International Public Health

International Public Health

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Restrictive policies, where staff avoid using episiotomy, appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies based on routine episiotomy.

Original language	English
Publisher	Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2010

Access to Document

MaternalHealth CD000081 June2010 FinalFinal published version, 196 KBLicence: CC BY-ND

Cite this

@misc{da8a9975ab0a49ea9cda7d2eafc3c8b7,

title = "Is it better to use episiotomy as needed, or routinely? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review",

abstract = "Restrictive policies, where staff avoid using episiotomy, appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies based on routine episiotomy.",

author = "\{International Public Health\}, LSTM",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "English",

publisher = "Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Is it better to use episiotomy as needed, or routinely? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review

AU - International Public Health, LSTM

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Restrictive policies, where staff avoid using episiotomy, appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies based on routine episiotomy.

AB - Restrictive policies, where staff avoid using episiotomy, appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies based on routine episiotomy.

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

ER -

Is it better to use episiotomy as needed, or routinely? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this