Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 faecal shedding in the community: a prospective household cohort study (COVID-LIV) in the UK

Natasha Marcella Vaselli, Wega Setiabudi, Krishanthi Subramaniam, Emily Adams, Lance Turtle, Miren Iturriza-Gómara, Tom Solomon, Nigel A. Cunliffe, Neil French, Daniel Hungerford, Daniel Hungerford, Roberto Vivancos, Mark Gabbay, Iain Buchan, Enitan D. Carrol, Carrol Gamble, Lynnette Crossley, Neil Joseph, Moon Wilton, Lee D. TroughtonSamantha Kilada, Katharine Abba, Victoria Simpson, John S.P. Tulloch, Lynsey Goodwin, Rachael Daws, Shiva Seyed Forootan, Susan Dobson, Rachel Press, Vida Spaine, Lesley Hands, Kate Bradfield, Carol McNally, Tracy Moitt, Silviya Balabanova, Chloe Donohue, Lynsey Finnetty, Laura Marsh, William Greenhalf, Dean J. Naisbitt, Victoria E. Shaw, Jayne Jones, Iain Slack, Jessica Mason, Thomas Edwards, Claudia McKeown, Chris Williams, Rachel Byrne, Gala Garrod, Sophie Owen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

SARS-CoV-2 is frequently shed in the stool of patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The extent of faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 among individuals in the community, and its potential to contribute to spread of disease, is unknown.

Methods

In this prospective, observational cohort study among households in Liverpool, UK, participants underwent weekly nasal/throat swabbing to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus, over a 12-week period from enrolment starting July 2020. Participants that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were asked to provide a stool sample three and 14 days later. In addition, in October and November 2020, during a period of high community transmission, stool sampling was undertaken to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 faecal shedding among all study participants. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected using Real-Time PCR.

Results

A total of 434 participants from 176 households were enrolled. Eighteen participants (4.2%: 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5–6.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus on nasal/throat swabs and of these, 3/17 (18%: 95% CI 4–43%) had SARS-CoV-2 detected in stool. Two of three participants demonstrated ongoing faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, without gastrointestinal symptoms, after testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. Among 165/434 participants without SARS-CoV-2 infection and who took part in the prevalence study, none had SARS-CoV-2 in stool. There was no demonstrable household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among households containing a participant with faecal shedding.

Conclusions

Faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 occurred among community participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, during a period of high community transmission, faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 was not detected among participants without SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is unlikely that the faecal-oral route plays a significant role in household and community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Original languageEnglish
Article number784
Pages (from-to)784
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date9 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Asymptomatic
  • Cohort study
  • Community
  • COVID-19
  • Faecal shedding
  • Gastrointestinal
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Transmission

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 faecal shedding in the community: a prospective household cohort study (COVID-LIV) in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this