Abstract
Authors of systematic reviews may perform subgroup analyses to investigate how treatment effect varies across different subgroups of patients or trials. Previous research has shown that Cochrane review authors do not sufficiently report their interpretation of subgroup analyses. Consequently, we developed a tutorial with the aim of improving the interpretation of subgroup analyses in reviews. We explain the importance of interpreting subgroup analyses, and demonstrate how to interpret subgroup analyses using theoretical examples and a real-life subgroup analysis with clinical context. Finally, we provide recommendations for the interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-198 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 24 May 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- Subgroup analyses
- Systematic reviews
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver