Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI)

  • Peter Baker
  • , Edwine Barasa
  • , Kalipso Chalkidou
  • , Lumbwe Chola
  • , Anthony Culyer
  • , Saudamini Dabak
  • , Victoria Y. Fan
  • , Katrine Frønsdal
  • , Lieke Fleur Heupink
  • , Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
  • , Rahab Mbau
  • , Abha Mehndiratta
  • , Justice Nonvignon
  • , Francis Ruiz
  • , Yot Teerawattananon
  • , Anna Vassall
  • , Javier Guzman
  • Center for Global Development
  • Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobi
  • The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • University of York
  • Thailand Ministry of Public Health
  • University of Toronto
  • Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • National University of Singapore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All health systems must set priorities. Evidence-informed priority-setting (EIPS) is a specific form of systematic priority-setting which involves explicit consideration of evidence to determine the healthcare interventions to be provided. The international Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) was established in 2013 as a collaborative platform to catalyze faster progress on EIPS, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This article summarizes the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from ten years of iDSI partnering with countries to develop EIPS institutions and processes. This is a thematic documentary analysis, structured by iDSI’s theory of change, extracting successes, challenges, and lessons from three external evaluations and 19 internal reports to funders. We identified three phases of iDSI’s work—inception (2013–15), scale-up (2016–2019), and focus on Africa (2019–2023). iDSI has established a global platform for coordinating EIPS, advanced the field, and supported regional networks in Asia and Africa. It has facilitated progress in securing high-level commitment to EIPS, strengthened EIPS institutions, and developed capacity for health technology assessments. This has resulted in improved decisions on service provision, procurement, and clinical care. Major lessons learned include the importance of sustained political will to develop EIPS; a clear EIPS mandate; inclusive governance structures appropriate to health financing context; politically sensitive and country-led support to EIPS, taking advantage of policy windows for EIPS reforms; regional networks for peer support and long-term sustainability; utilization of context appropriate methods such as adaptive HTA; and crucially, donor-funded global health initiatives supporting and integrating with national EIPS systems, not undermining them.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2330112
JournalHealth systems and reform
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Aug 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Health economics
  • health technology assessment
  • institutionalization [tbc with journal]
  • low- and middle-income countries
  • priority setting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this