TY - JOUR
T1 - International evaluation of the SEIZUre Risk in Encephalitis (SEIZURE) score for predicting acute seizure risk
AU - The Global NeuroResearch Coalition
AU - Hughes, Thomas
AU - Venkatesan, Arun
AU - Hetherington, Claire
AU - Egbe, Franklyn Nkongho
AU - Netravathi, M.
AU - Thakur, Kiran T.
AU - Baykan, Betul
AU - Hui Jan, Tan
AU - Arias, Susana
AU - García-De Soto, Jesús
AU - Kahwagi, Jamil
AU - Vogrig, Alberto
AU - Versace, Salvatore
AU - Habis, Ralph
AU - Sowmitran, Swathi
AU - Husari, Khalil S.
AU - Probasco, John
AU - Hasbun, Rodrigo
AU - Bean, Paris
AU - Heck, Ashley
AU - GözübatıkÇelik, Gökçen R.
AU - Ataklı, Dilek
AU - Mayda Domac, Fusun
AU - Ferreira, Vitor
AU - Calado, Sofia
AU - Sangeeth, Thuppanattumadam Ananthasubramanian
AU - Defres, Sylviane
AU - Romozzi, Marina
AU - Iorio, Raffaele
AU - Pensato, Umberto
AU - Pleshkevich, Maria
AU - Steriade, Claude
AU - Sharifi-Razavi, Athena
AU - Tabrizi, Nasim
AU - Sipila, Jussi
AU - Kim, Carla Y.
AU - Diaz-Ariza, Alexandra
AU - Satish, Poorvikha
AU - Gowda, Vinutha
AU - Gowda, Chandrakanta
AU - Oh, Seong Il
AU - Del Capio-Orantes, Luis
AU - Cotelli, Mariasofia
AU - Ferreira, Luís
AU - Kovalchuk, Maria
AU - Goncharova, Anna
AU - Solomon, Tom
AU - Winkler, Andrea
AU - Guekht, Alla
AU - Wood, Greta K.
PY - 2025/12/7
Y1 - 2025/12/7
N2 - Objective Encephalitis is brain parenchyma inflammation, frequently resulting in seizures which worsens outcomes. Early anti-seizure medication could improve outcomes but requires identifying patients at greatest risk of acute seizures. The SEIZURE (SEIZUre Risk in Encephalitis) score was developed in UK cohorts to stratify patients by acute seizure risk. A ‘basic score’ used Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), fever and age; the ‘advanced score’ added aetiology. This study aimed to evaluate the score internationally to determine its global applicability. Design Patients were retrospectively analysed regionally, and by country, in this international evaluation study. Univariate analysis was conducted between patients who did and did not have inpatient seizures, followed by multivariable logistic regression, hierarchical clustering and analysis of the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) with 95% CIs. Participants and setting 2032 patients across 13 countries were identified, among whom 1324 were included in SEIZURE score calculations and 970 were included in regression modelling. The involved countries comprised 19 organisations spanning all WHO regions. Outcome measures The primary outcome was measuring inpatient seizure rates. Results Autoantibody-associated encephalitis, low GCS and presenting with a seizure were frequently associated with inpatient seizures; fever showed no association. Globally, the score had limited discriminatory ability (basic AUROC 0.58 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.62), advanced AUROC 0.63 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.66)). The scoring system performed acceptably in western Europe, excluding Spain, with the best performance in Portugal (basic AUROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.94), advanced AUROC 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.95)). Conclusions The SEIZURE score performed best in several countries in Western Europe but performed poorly elsewhere, partly due to differing and unknown aetiologies. In most regions, the score did not reach a threshold to be clinically useful. The Western European results could aid in designing clinical trials assessing primary anti-seizure prophylaxis in encephalitis following further prospective trials. Beyond Western Europe, there is a need for tailored, localised scoring systems and future large-scale prospective studies with optimised aetiological testing to accurately identify high-risk patients.
AB - Objective Encephalitis is brain parenchyma inflammation, frequently resulting in seizures which worsens outcomes. Early anti-seizure medication could improve outcomes but requires identifying patients at greatest risk of acute seizures. The SEIZURE (SEIZUre Risk in Encephalitis) score was developed in UK cohorts to stratify patients by acute seizure risk. A ‘basic score’ used Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), fever and age; the ‘advanced score’ added aetiology. This study aimed to evaluate the score internationally to determine its global applicability. Design Patients were retrospectively analysed regionally, and by country, in this international evaluation study. Univariate analysis was conducted between patients who did and did not have inpatient seizures, followed by multivariable logistic regression, hierarchical clustering and analysis of the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) with 95% CIs. Participants and setting 2032 patients across 13 countries were identified, among whom 1324 were included in SEIZURE score calculations and 970 were included in regression modelling. The involved countries comprised 19 organisations spanning all WHO regions. Outcome measures The primary outcome was measuring inpatient seizure rates. Results Autoantibody-associated encephalitis, low GCS and presenting with a seizure were frequently associated with inpatient seizures; fever showed no association. Globally, the score had limited discriminatory ability (basic AUROC 0.58 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.62), advanced AUROC 0.63 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.66)). The scoring system performed acceptably in western Europe, excluding Spain, with the best performance in Portugal (basic AUROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.94), advanced AUROC 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.95)). Conclusions The SEIZURE score performed best in several countries in Western Europe but performed poorly elsewhere, partly due to differing and unknown aetiologies. In most regions, the score did not reach a threshold to be clinically useful. The Western European results could aid in designing clinical trials assessing primary anti-seizure prophylaxis in encephalitis following further prospective trials. Beyond Western Europe, there is a need for tailored, localised scoring systems and future large-scale prospective studies with optimised aetiological testing to accurately identify high-risk patients.
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Neurology
KW - Neuropathology
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099451
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099451
M3 - Article
C2 - 41360470
AN - SCOPUS:105024146072
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 15
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 12
M1 - e099451
ER -