Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.

  • Alex Schade
  • , Maureen Sabawo
  • , Zahra Jaffry
  • , Nohakhelha Nyamulani
  • , Chikumbutso Clara Mpanga
  • , Leonard Banza Ngoie
  • , Andrew John Metcalfe
  • , David Graham Lalloo
  • , William James Harrison
  • , Andrew Leather
  • , Peter MacPherson
  • Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Malawi
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • Kamuzu Central Hospital
  • University of Warwick
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • AO Alliance Foundation
  • King's College London
  • University of Glasgow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the impact of an open fracture intervention bundle on clinical management and patient outcomes of adults in Malawi with open tibia fractures. We conducted a before-and-after implementation study in Malawi in 2021 and 2022 to assess the impact of an open fracture intervention bundle, including a national education course for clinical officers and management guidelines for open fractures. We recruited 287 patients with open tibia fractures. The primary outcome was a before-and-after comparison of the self-reported short musculoskeletal function assessment score, a measure of patient function. Secondary outcomes included clinical management; and clinician knowledge and implementation evaluation outcomes of 57 health-care providers attending the course. We also constructed multilevel regression models to investigate associations between clinical knowledge, patient function, and implementation evaluation before and after the intervention. The median patient function score at 1 year was 6.8 (interquartile range, IQR: 1.5 to 14.5) before intervention and 8.4 (IQR: 3.8 to 23.2) after intervention. Compared with baseline scores, we found clinicians' open fracture knowledge scores improved 1 year after the intervention was implemented (mean posterior difference: 1.6, 95% highest density interval: 0.9 to 2.4). However, we found no difference in most aspects of clinicians' open fracture management practice. Despite possible improvement in clinician knowledge and positive evaluation of the intervention implementation, our study showed that there was no overall improvement in clinical management, and weak evidence of worsening patient function 1 year after injury, after implementation of the open fracture intervention bundle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-264
Number of pages10
JournalBulletin of the World Health Organization
Volume102
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Feb 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this