Improving rifampicin resistant tuberculosis diagnosis with Xpert® MTB/RIF: modelling interventions and costs

  • Rory Dunbar
  • , Pren Naidoo
  • , Nulda Beyers
  • , Ivor Langley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Setting

Cape Town, South Africa

Objective

To model RMP-R diagnosis and laboratory costs in smear/culture and Xpert-based algorithms and the effect of varying adherence and HIV testing in the Xpert-based algorithm.

Methods

We used a validated operational model (100,000 population) and published laboratory cost data. We estimated the number and cost of RMP-R TB cases identified between a smear/culture and Xpert-based algorithm. We modelled varying adherence and different levels of known HIV-status to the Xpert-based algorithm.

Results

RMP-R TB cases identified increased from 603 with smear/culture to 1,178 with the Xpert-based algorithm (100% adherence - 60% knew their HIV status). The overall laboratory cost increased from U$1,073,858 to U$2,430,050 and the cost per RMP-TB case identified increased from U$1,781 to U$2,063 in respective algorithms.

When adherence to the Xpert-based algorithm was increased from 50% to 100% (60% knew their HIV-status), the number of RMP-R TB cases identified increased from 721 to 1,178.

Conclusion

The Xpert-based algorithm is efficient in identifying RMP-R TB as the increase in costs is offset by the increase in the number of cases identified. Adherence to the Xpert-based algorithm is important to ensure all presumptive TB cases receive the benefit of simultaneous TB and RMP-R testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)890-898
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Diagnostic algorithms
  • HIV testing
  • MDR/RR-TB
  • Operational modelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving rifampicin resistant tuberculosis diagnosis with Xpert® MTB/RIF: modelling interventions and costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this