Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving penicillin allergy documentation in UK Defence Primary Healthcare: a quality improvement project

  • Alexander D. Harbourne
  • , Scott J.C. Pallett
  • , Matthew K. O’Shea
  • , Oliver Perigo
  • , Michael Lindsay
  • , Stephen Woolley
  • Royal Navy
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Birmingham
  • Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Up to 10% of patients report a penicillin allergy, yet >90% of these are inaccurate when assessed. Unnecessary second-line antibiotics contribute to poorer outcomes, increased antimicrobial resistance and higher costs. Accurate documentation supports stewardship and operational medical capability by improving clinical risk decisions, particularly in deployed or austere settings. We aimed to improve the proportion of adequately documented penicillin allergy records in a UK Defence primary care setting. 

Methods: In a baseline population (n=33/70 labelled patients), 21% (±10%, 95% CI) of records were adequately documented using national standards. A structured patient questionnaire, developed with NHS Lothian guidance, was piloted via email, refined and scaled across a broader primary care setting using SMS text messages plus follow-up email. Records were updated in the electronic health record. Using the Model for Improvement, three PDSA cycles tested usability, refined content and scaled implementation to the full cohort (n=504 coded penicillin allergy). Daily sampling (n=10/day) supported p-chart monitoring from a 21% baseline with a three-sigma upper control limit (UCL) of 60%. 

Results: 270/504 (54%) patients responded. Daily p-chart monitoring demonstrated sustained non-random improvement following intervention (day 8): median shifted from 20% (day 7) to 55% (day 12) and 65% (day 18), reaching the UCL by day 10. 38% of patients were unclear about their index allergic reaction. 33% reported a mild rash, 18% gastrointestinal upset and 18% angioedema. Symptoms associated with potential type 1 hypersensitivity or severe cutaneous reactions were infrequently reported. Using NHS protocols, an estimated 79% of documented penicillin-allergic service personnel would be suitable for drug provocation testing. 

Conclusion: A remote, patient-centred approach with standardised data entry improved documentation quality and is scalable across UK Defence Primary Healthcare. Next steps include embedding driver-diagram-informed actions (clinician awareness and digital templates), assessing prescribing outcomes and developing Defence standard operating procedures.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Military Health
Early online date10 Jun 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Change management
  • MICROBIOLOGY
  • Quality in health care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving penicillin allergy documentation in UK Defence Primary Healthcare: a quality improvement project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this