Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: evidence from health facility data from Benin

  • Filémon T. Tokponnon
  • , Yolande Sissinto
  • , Aurore Hounto Ogouyémi
  • , Adicath Adéola Adéothy
  • , Alioun Adechoubou
  • , Télesphore Houansou
  • , Mariam Oke
  • , Dorothée Kinde-Gazard
  • , Achille Massougbodji
  • , Martin C. Akogbeto
  • , Sylvie Cornelie
  • , Vincent Corbel
  • , Tessa B. Knox
  • , Abraham Peter Mnzava
  • , Martin Donnelly
  • , Immo Kleinschmidt
  • , John Bradley
  • National Malaria Control Programme
  • Ministry of Health
  • Université d'Abomey-Calavi
  • World Health Organization
  • Centre de recherche entomologique de Cotonou
  • Université Montpellier
  • African Leaders Malaria Alliance
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

Insecticide-based interventions have averted more than 500 million malaria cases since 2000, but insecticide resistance in mosquitoes could bring about a rebound in disease and mortality. This study investigated whether insecticide resistance was associated with increased incidence of clinical malaria.

Methods

In an area of southern Benin with insecticide resistance and high use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), malaria morbidity and insecticide resistance were measured simultaneously in 30 clusters (villages or collections of villages) multiple times over the course of 2 years. Insecticide resistance frequencies were measured using the standard World Health Organization bioassay test. Malaria morbidity was measured by cases recorded at health facilities both in the whole population using routinely collected data and in a passively followed cohort of children under 5 years old.

Results

There was no evidence that incidence of malaria from routinely collected data was higher in clusters with resistance frequencies above the median, either in children aged under 5 (RR = 1.27 (95% CI 0.81–2.00) p = 0.276) or in individuals aged 5 or over (RR = 1.74 (95% CI 0.91–3.34) p = 0.093). There was also no evidence that incidence was higher in clusters with resistance frequencies above the median in the passively followed cohort (RR = 1.11 (0.52–2.35) p = 0.777).

Conclusions

This study found no association between frequency of resistance and incidence of clinical malaria in an area where ITNs are the principal form of vector control. This may be because, as other studies have shown, ITNs continue to offer some protection from malaria even in the presence of insecticide resistance. Irrespective of resistance, nets provide only partial protection so the development of improved or supplementary vector control tools is required to reduce Africa’s unacceptably high malaria burden.

Original languageEnglish
Article number37
Pages (from-to)e37
JournalMalaria Journal
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Insecticide
  • Malaria
  • Pyrethroid
  • Resistance
  • Vector

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: evidence from health facility data from Benin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this