Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness

R. S. French; Frances Cowan; D. J.A. Mansour; S. Morris; T. Procter; D. Hughes; A. Robinson; J. Guillebaud

doi:10.3310/hta4070

Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness

R. S. French, Frances Cowan, D. J.A. Mansour, S. Morris, T. Procter, D. Hughes, A. Robinson, J. Guillebaud

University College London

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	i-iii+v-vi+1-98
Journal	Health Technology Assessment
Volume	4
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2000
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.3310/hta4070

Cite this

French, R. S., Cowan, F., Mansour, D. J. A., Morris, S., Procter, T., Hughes, D., Robinson, A., & Guillebaud, J. (2000). Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment, 4(7), i-iii+v-vi+1-98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070

French, R. S. ; Cowan, Frances ; Mansour, D. J.A. et al. / Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. In: Health Technology Assessment. 2000 ; Vol. 4, No. 7. pp. i-iii+v-vi+1-98.

@article{7817bd1f8c4044809a6a91b29c0f0ab8,

title = "Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness",

author = "French, \{R. S.\} and Frances Cowan and Mansour, \{D. J.A.\} and S. Morris and T. Procter and D. Hughes and A. Robinson and J. Guillebaud",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3310/hta4070",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "i--iii+v--vi+1--98",

journal = "Health Technology Assessment",

issn = "1366-5278",

publisher = "NIHR Journals Library",

number = "7",

}

French, RS, Cowan, F, Mansour, DJA, Morris, S, Procter, T, Hughes, D, Robinson, A & Guillebaud, J 2000, 'Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness', Health Technology Assessment, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. i-iii+v-vi+1-98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4070

Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. / French, R. S.; Cowan, Frances; Mansour, D. J.A. et al.
In: Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 4, No. 7, 01.01.2000, p. i-iii+v-vi+1-98.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness

AU - French, R. S.

AU - Cowan, Frances

AU - Mansour, D. J.A.

AU - Morris, S.

AU - Procter, T.

AU - Hughes, D.

AU - Robinson, A.

AU - Guillebaud, J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

U2 - 10.3310/hta4070

DO - 10.3310/hta4070

M3 - Review article

SN - 1366-5278

VL - 4

SP - i-iii+v-vi+1-98

JO - Health Technology Assessment

JF - Health Technology Assessment

IS - 7

ER -

French RS, Cowan F, Mansour DJA, Morris S, Procter T, Hughes D et al. Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness: Two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment. 2000 Jan 1;4(7):i-iii+v-vi+1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta4070