Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes With Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights From the REC-CAGEFREE I Trial

  • Xiongwei Bai
  • , Haokao Gao
  • , Yuehao Lv
  • , Dongdong Sun
  • , Qiong Wang
  • , Zhiyong Yin
  • , Shangyu Wen
  • , Yuanzhe Jin
  • , Hui Chen
  • , Ming Yuan
  • , Lin Zhong
  • , Sigan Hu
  • , Zhexun Lian
  • , Hesong Zeng
  • , Hongwei Pan
  • , Jianzheng Liu
  • , Guotao Fu
  • , Ruining Zhang
  • , Xingqiang He
  • , Davide Capodanno
  • Scot Garg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Duolao Wang, Patrick W. Serruys, Chao Gao, Ling Tao
  • Xijing Hospital
  • Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital
  • China Medical University
  • Capital Medical University
  • Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
  • Bengbu Medical College
  • Qingdao University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • University of Catania
  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • University of Central Lancashire
  • University of Galway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains limited. Aims: To assess the prognosis of DCB versus DES in patients with and without CKD. 

Methods: REC-CAGEFREE I was an investigator-initiated, non-inferiority trial conducted at 43 sites in China, which randomized 2272 patients to paclitaxel-coated balloons with the option of rescue stenting (DCB group) or second-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (DES group) for treating de novo lesions, regardless of vessel diameter. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, patients were stratified based on the presence of CKD (kidney damage or estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m²) at baseline. The primary outcome was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE; including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically and physiologically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 2 years. 

Results: Of 2272 patients enrolled, 203 (8.9%) had CKD, with 95 and 108 treated with DCB and DES, respectively. At 2 years, the risk of DoCE was significantly higher in CKD versus non-CKD patients (22/203 [10.9%] vs. 88/2069 [4.3%], HRIPTW: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13−4.07, p = 0.022). There was no significant interaction between CKD and treatment allocation (pinteraction = 0.352). Among CKD patients, DoCE occurred in 12/95 (12.7%) and 10/108 (9.3%) patients in the DCB and DES groups (HRIPTW: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.66−3.71, p = 0.317), respectively. Among non-CKD patients, DoCE occurred in 60/1038 (5.8%) versus 28/1031 (2.7%) patients in the DCB and DES groups (HRIPTW: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.38−3.72, p = 0.002), respectively.

Conclusion: Patients with CKD had worse outcomes compared to those without. DCBs were associated with a higher risk of DoCE than DES, irrespective of CKD status. Trial Registration: Unique Identifier: NCT04561739; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-314
Number of pages11
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2025

Keywords

  • chronic kidney disease
  • drug-coated balloon
  • drug-eluting stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes With Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights From the REC-CAGEFREE I Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this