Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Identifying opportunities to optimize mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: A visualization and descriptive analysis using process mapping

  • Eileen Kazura
  • , Jabaselvi Johnson
  • , Chloe Morozoff
  • , Kumudha Aruldas
  • , Euripide Avokpaho
  • , Comlanvi Innocent Togbevi
  • , Félicien Chabi
  • , Marie Claire Gwayi-Chore
  • , Providence Nindi
  • , Angelin Titus
  • , Parfait Houngbegnon
  • , Saravanakumar Puthupalayam Kaliappan
  • , Yesudoss Jacob
  • , James Simwanza
  • , Khumbo Kalua
  • , Judd L. Walson
  • , Moudachirou Ibikounlé
  • , Sitara S.R. Ajjampur
  • , Arianna Rubin Means
  • University of Washington
  • Christian Medical College
  • The DeWorm3 Project
  • Institut de Recherche Cliniques du Benin (IRCB)
  • Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach
  • Université d'Abomey-Calavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background The control of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is achieved through mass drug administration (MDA) with deworming medications targeting children and other high-risk groups. Recent evidence suggests that it may be possible to interrupt STH transmission by deworming individuals of all ages via community-wide MDA (cMDA). However, a change in delivery platforms will require altering implementation processes. 

Methods We used process mapping, an operational research methodology, to describe the activities required for effective implementation of school-based and cMDA in 18 heterogenous areas and over three years in Benin, India, and Malawi. Planned activities were identified during workshops prior to initiation of a large cMDA trial (the DeWorm3 trial). The process maps were updated annually post-implementation, including adding or removing activities (e.g., adaptations) and determining whether activities occurred according to plan. Descriptive analyses were performed to quantify differences and similarities at baseline and over three implementation years. Comparative analyses were also conducted between study sites and areas implementing school-based vs. cMDA. Digitized process maps were developed to provide a visualization of MDA processes and inspected to identify implementation bottle-necks and inefficient activity flows. Results Across three years and all clusters, implementation of cMDA required an average of 13 additional distinct activities and was adapted more often (5.2 adaptations per year) than school-based MDA. An average of 41% of activities across both MDA platforms did not occur according to planned timelines; however, deviations were often purposeful to improve implementation efficiency or effectiveness. Visualized process maps demonstrated that receipt of drugs at the local level may be an implementation bottleneck. Many activities rely on the effective setting of MDA dates and estimating quantity of drugs, suggesting that the timing of these activities is important to meet planned programmatic outcomes. 

Conclusion Implementation processes were heterogenous across settings, suggesting that MDA is highly context and resource dependent and that there are many viable ways to implement MDA. Process mapping could be deployed to support a transition from a school-based control program to community-wide STH transmission interruption program and potentially to enable integration with other community-based campaigns.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0011772
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying opportunities to optimize mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: A visualization and descriptive analysis using process mapping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this