Human Direct Skin Feeding versus Membrane Feeding to Assess the Mosquitocidal Efficacy of High-Dose Ivermectin (IVERMAL Trial)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

Ivermectin is being considered for mass-drug-administration for malaria due to its ability to kill mosquitoes feeding on recently treated individuals. In a recent trial, 3-day courses of 300 and 600 mcg/kg/day were shown to kill Anopheles mosquitoes for at least 28 days post-treatment when fed patients’ venous blood using membrane-feeding-assays. Direct-skin-feeding on humans may lead to higher mosquito-mortality as ivermectin capillary-concentrations are higher. We compared mosquito-mortality following direct-skin- and membrane-feeding.

Methods

We conducted a mosquito feeding study nested within a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 141 adults with uncomplicated malaria in Kenya comparing 3-day ivermectin 0 (n=46), 300 (n=48), or 600 mcg/kg/day (n=47), co-administered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. On post-treatment day-7, direct-skin and membrane-feeding assays were conducted using laboratory-reared Anopheles gambiae s.s.. Mosquito survival was assessed daily for 28-days-post-feeding.

Results

Between July-20–2015 and May-7-2016, 69 of 141 patients participated in both direct-skin- and membrane-feeding (placebo n=23, 300mcg/kg/day n=24, 600mcg/kg/day n=22). The 14-day-post-feeding mortality for mosquitoes fed on blood 7-days post-treatment from patients in both ivermectin arms pooled was similar with direct-skin-feeding (n=2,941 mosquitoes) versus membrane-feeding (n=7,380 mosquitoes): cumulative-mortality (RR=0.99, 0.95–1.03, p=0.69) and survival-time (HR=0.96, 0.91–1.02, p=0.19). Results were consistent by sex, body-mass-index, and across the range of ivermectin capillary concentrations studied (0.72–73.9 ng/mL).

Conclusions

Direct-skin-feeding and membrane-feeding on day 7 resulted in similar mosquitocidal-effects of ivermectin across a wide range of drug-concentrations, suggesting that the mosquitocidal-effects seen with membrane-feeding accurately reflect those of natural-biting. Membrane-feeding, which is more patient-friendly and ethically acceptable, can likely reliably be used to assess ivermectin’s mosquitocidal-efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1112-1119
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume69
Issue number7
Early online date16 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Anopheles gambiae
  • direct skin feeding
  • ivermectin
  • malaria
  • membrane feeding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human Direct Skin Feeding versus Membrane Feeding to Assess the Mosquitocidal Efficacy of High-Dose Ivermectin (IVERMAL Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this