HSV-2 specific serology should not be offered routinely to antenatal patients

Dawn Wilkinson, Simon Barton, Frances Cowan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The proposal to introduce antenatal screening for HSV has no evidence for a public or individual health benefit; indeed, it has the potential to increase anxiety for patients, with a minimal likelihood of reducing the risk of neonatal herpes infection. Antenatal screening of an essentially healthy population of women must be validated in settings of different rates of neonatal HSV infection and the purposes and limitations of screening clearly outlined. Identification of pregnant women at risk of acquiring genital herpes in pregnancy is also dependent upon being able to obtain the serostatus of the male sexual partner which will reduce the practical application of the test if both patient and partners need to be screened. We recommend that efforts to improve on the currently established mechanisms for reducing the morbidity of neonatal herpes, namely early diagnosis and prompt treatment, must take priority for resources over new and unevaluated screening programmes, such as routine testing of antenatal patients. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-153
Number of pages9
JournalReviews in Medical Virology
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HSV-2 specific serology should not be offered routinely to antenatal patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this