HIV post-exposure prophylaxis programmes in the developed and developing world: Can we learn from each other?: Can we learn from each other?

G. C. van der Maaten, J. Davies, M. Nyirenda, A. Chitani, T. J. Allain, Nicholas Beeching, M. B.J. Beadsworth, J. J. van Oosterhout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: In an audit of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) programmes in Blantyre, Malawi, and Liverpool, UK, a striking common deficiency was poor attendance of follow-up visits and of HIV testing to determine efficacy of PEP. Causes of poor follow-up after PEP need to be explored in both settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-752
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Journal of Std & Aids
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Follow-up rates
  • HIV
  • Malawi
  • PEP
  • PEPSE
  • Post-exposure prophylaxis
  • UK

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HIV post-exposure prophylaxis programmes in the developed and developing world: Can we learn from each other?: Can we learn from each other?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this