Facilitating Next-Generation Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Clinical Trials Using HIV Recent Infection Assays: A Consensus Statement from the Forum HIV Prevention Trial Design Project: A Consensus Statement from the Forum HIV Prevention Trial Design Project

  • Neil Parkin
  • , Fei Gao
  • , Eduard Grebe
  • , Amy Cutrell
  • , Moupali Das
  • , Deborah Donnell
  • , Ann Duerr
  • , David V. Glidden
  • , James P. Hughes
  • , Jeffrey Murray
  • , Michael N. Robertson
  • , Joerg Zinserling
  • , Joseph Lau
  • , Veronica Miller
  • , Yen Pottinger
  • , Regine Lehnert
  • , Timothy D. Mastro
  • , Beatriz Grinsztejn
  • , Tamar Tchelidze
  • , Jared Baeten
  • Christoph Carter, Stephanie Cox, Ramin Ebrahimi, Alex Kintu, James Rooney, Yongwu Shao, Jessica E. Justman, Zeda Rosenberg, Oliver Laeyendecker, Susan H. Eshelman, Frances Cowan, Brian Rice, Joe Ma, Elizabeth Russell, Kathleen Squires, Ronald Mink, Alex Welte, Kimberly Struble, Wen Zeng, David Dunn, Peter J. Dailey, Sandra McCoy, George Rutherford, Susie Welty, Bharat Parekh, Dawn K. Smith, Lusine Ghazaryan, Vani Vannappagari, Michael P. Busch, Sally Hodder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standard-of-care HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly efficacious, but uptake of and persistence on a daily oral pill is low in many settings. Evaluation of alternate PrEP products will require innovation to avoid the unpractically large sample sizes in noninferiority trials. We propose estimating HIV incidence in people not on PrEP as an external counterfactual to which on-PrEP incidence in trial subjects can be compared. HIV recent infection testing algorithms (RITAs), such as the limiting antigen avidity assay plus viral load used on specimens from untreated HIV positive people identified during screening, is one possible approach. Its feasibility is partly dependent on the sample size needed to ensure adequate power, which is impacted by RITA performance, the number of recent infections identified, the expected efficacy of the intervention, and other factors. Screening sample sizes to support detection of an 80% reduction in incidence for 3 key populations are more modest, and comparable to the number of participants in recent phase III PrEP trials. Sample sizes would be significantly larger in populations with lower incidence, where the false recency rate is higher or if PrEP efficacy is expected to be lower. Our proposed counterfactual approach appears to be feasible, offers high statistical power, and is nearly contemporaneous with the on-PrEP population. It will be important to monitor the performance of this approach during new product development for HIV prevention. If successful, it could be a model for preventive HIV vaccines and prevention of other infectious diseases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-40
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitating Next-Generation Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Clinical Trials Using HIV Recent Infection Assays: A Consensus Statement from the Forum HIV Prevention Trial Design Project: A Consensus Statement from the Forum HIV Prevention Trial Design Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this