Evidence of multiple intraspecific transmission routes for Leptospira acquisition in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus)

A. Minter, Peter Diggle, F. Costa, J. Childs, A. I. Ko, M. Begon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Infectious diseases frequently have multiple potential routes of intraspecific transmission of pathogens within wildlife and other populations. For pathogens causing zoonotic diseases, knowing whether these transmission routes occur in the wild and their relative importance, is critical for understanding maintenance, improving control measures and ultimately preventing human disease. The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) is the primary reservoir of leptospirosis in the urban slums of Salvador, Brazil. There is biological evidence for potentially three different transmission routes of leptospire infection occurring in the rodent population. Using newly obtained prevalence data from rodents trapped at an urban slum field site, we present changes in cumulative risk of infection in relation to age-dependent transmission routes to infer which intra-specific transmission routes occur in the wild. We found that a significant proportion of animals leave the nest with infection and that the risk of infection increases throughout the lifetime of Norway rats. We did not observe a significant effect of sexual maturity on the risk of infection. In conclusion, our results suggest that vertical and environmental transmission of leptospirosis both occur in wild populations of Norway rats.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3438-3448
Number of pages11
JournalEpidemiology and Infection
Volume145
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Age-prevalence
  • intraspecific transmission
  • leptospirosis
  • Norway rats

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence of multiple intraspecific transmission routes for Leptospira acquisition in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this