Evidence informing the UK’s COVID-19 public health response must be transparent

Nisreen A. Alwan, Raj Bhopal, Rochelle A. Burgess, Tim Colburn, Luis Cuevas, George Davey Smith, Matthias Egger, Sandra Eldridge, Valentina Gallo, Mark S. Gilthorpe, Trish Greenhalgh, Christopher Griffiths, Paul R. Hunter, Shabbar Jaffar, Ruth Jepson, Nicola Low, Adrian Martineau, David McCoy, Miriam Orcutt, Bharat PankhaniaHynek Pikhart, Allyson Pollock, Gabriel Scally, James Smith, Devi Sridhar, Stephanie Taylor, Peter W.G. Tennant, Yrene Themistocleous, Anne Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The UK Government asserts that its response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is based on evidence and expert modelling. However, different scientists can reach different conclusions based on the same evidence, and small differences in assumptions can lead to large differences in model predictions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1036-1037
Number of pages2
JournalThe Lancet
Volume395
Issue number10229
Early online date17 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence informing the UK’s COVID-19 public health response must be transparent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this