Abstract
In the global drive for elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF), 15 countries have achieved validation of elimination as a public health problem (EPHP). Recent empirical evidence has demonstrated that EPHP does not always lead to elimination of transmission (EOT). Here we show how the probability of elimination explicitly depends on key biological parameters, many of which have been poorly characterized, leading to a poor evidence base for the elimination threshold. As more countries progress towards EPHP it is essential that this process is well-informed, as prematurely halting treatment and surveillance programs could pose a serious threat to global progress. We highlight that refinement of the weak empirical evidence base
is vital to understand drivers of elimination and inform long-term policy
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 860-869 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Trends In Parasitology |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 7 Sept 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- break-point
- elimination
- lymphatic filariasis
- modelling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the Evidence for Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver