Abstract
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors flagged the following concern regarding how the data on variability of spray dose was analyzed:
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Edition | 1 |
| Volume | 19 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Mar 2026 |
Publication series
| Name | Parasites & vectors |
|---|---|
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Correction: Comparative analysis of the Potter Tower and a new Track Sprayer for the application of residual sprays in the laboratory (Parasites & vectors (2024) 17 1 PII: 104 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06168-x.)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Comparative analysis of the Potter Tower and a new Track Sprayer for the application of residual sprays in the laboratory
Bonds, J., Parsons, G., Walker, K., Murphy-Fegan, A., Lees, R., Nimmo, D., Clayton, J. & Malone, D., 16 Feb 2024, In: Parasites and Vectors. 17, 1, p. 66 66.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile3 Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver