Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal biopsies for the diagnosis of mediastinal diseases: A network meta-analysis

  • Yong Jia Qi
  • , Jing Zhang
  • , Esperanza Salcedo Lobera
  • , Qiu Yue Song
  • , Ren Hai Zhong
  • , Konstantina Kontogianni
  • , Zan Sheng Huang
  • , Miguel Ariza-Prota
  • , Nitesh Gupta
  • , Manu Madan
  • , Venkata Nagarjuna Maturu
  • , Virender Pratibh Prasad
  • , Carolin Steinack
  • , Na Wu
  • , Thomas Gaisl
  • , Felix J.F. Herth
  • , Ye Fan
  • Army Medical University
  • Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya
  • Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
  • Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
  • Max Institute of Respiratory
  • Yashoda Super Speciality Hospitals
  • University of Zurich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) as the initial diagnostic tool for lung cancer staging. However, despite the availability of mediastinal forceps biopsy and cryobiopsy, the optimal diagnostic approaches for other mediastinal conditions remain unclear. 

Methods: We searched multiple databases and sources up to February 21, 2025, and employed single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analytical approaches to comprehensively evaluate EBUS-based biopsies for mediastinal diseases in terms of efficacy and safety. 

Results: Fifteen prospective studies including 1,316 participants evaluated five EBUS-based mediastinal biopsy strategies (EBUS-TBNA, forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy, and the combinations of EBUS-TBNA with forceps biopsy or cryobiopsy) were involved. Concomitant EBUS-TBNA enhanced the efficacy of both forceps biopsy and cryobiopsy. EBUS-TBNA plus cryobiopsy yielded the best diagnostic outcome, showing significant benefits over EBUS-TBNA (OR 4.01, 95% CrI 3.05–5.33), forceps biopsy (OR 2.75, 95% CrI 1.94–3.92), cryobiopsy (OR 1.80, 95% CrI 1.33–2.45), and EBUS-TBNA plus forceps biopsy (OR 1.81, 95% CrI 1.20–2.72). A similarly favourable safety profile was observed in all EBUS-based biopsy methods. 

Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA is the diagnostic cornerstone for mediastinal lesions, with EBUS-TBNA plus cryobiopsy being most effective. All EBUS-guided biopsies demonstrated a favourable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2593067
JournalPulmonology
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date20 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jan 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • biopsy
  • Endobronchial ultrasound
  • interventional pulmonology
  • mediastinum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal biopsies for the diagnosis of mediastinal diseases: A network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this