Abstract
Background
Electronic mosquito repellents (EMRs) are marketed to prevent mosquitoes biting and to prevent malaria.
Objectives
To assess whether EMRs prevent mosquito bites, and to assess any evidence of an effect on malaria infection.
Search strategy
In August 2006, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, and the Science Citation Index. We also checked conference proceedings, contacted international specialist centres and EMR manufacturers, and checked reference lists.
Selection criteria
Field entomological studies, which controlled for geographic site, time, and attractiveness of human participants, of EMRs for preventing mosquito bites; and randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of EMRs to prevent malaria infection.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors assessed trial quality, and extracted and analysed the data.
Main results
Ten field entomological studies met the inclusion criteria. All 10 studies found that there was no difference in the number of mosquitoes caught from the bare body parts of the human participants with or without an EMR. No randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of EMR on malaria infection were found.
Authors' conclusions
Field entomological studies confirm that EMRs have no effect on preventing mosquito bites. Therefore there is no justification for marketing them to prevent malaria infection.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | CD005434 |
| Pages (from-to) | CD005434 |
| Journal | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2007 |
Keywords
- *Anopheles
- Animals
- Electronics
- Female
- Humans
- Insect bites and stings [*prevention & control]
- Malaria [*prevention & control]
- Mosquito control [*instrumentation]
- Population density