Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Economic evaluations of community health worker programs focussed on neglected tropical diseases in low- and middle-income countries (2015–2024): A scoping literature review

  • Linnea Stansert Katzen
  • , Madelyn Miyares
  • , Kelsey Vaughan
  • , Cleo Baskin
  • , Madeleine Ballard
  • , Maryse Kok
  • , Ariwame Jimenez
  • , Matias Iberico
  • , Jessica Cook
  • , Angele Bienvenue Ishimwe
  • , Lily Martin
  • , Patrick Kawooya
  • , Zeus Aranda
  • , Molly Mantus
  • , Meghan Bruce Kumar
  • , Karen E. Finnegan
  • , Sandra Mudhune
  • , Mardieh Dennis
  • , Daniel Palazuelos
  • , Dickson Mbewe
  • Michee Nshimayesu, Paul Revill, James O’Donovan
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Uppsala University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Bang for Buck Consulting
  • Community Health Impact Coalition (UK)
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme
  • Compañeros en Salud
  • Tulane University
  • Partners in Health
  • TIP Global Health
  • New York University
  • Nama Wellness Community Centre
  • Last Mile Health
  • Northumbria University
  • Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobi
  • Harvard University
  • Lwala Community Health
  • Last Mile Health
  • Kasungu District Council
  • University of Global Health Equity
  • University of York

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a diverse group of more than twenty diseases caused by parasitic, bacterial, and viral infections, affecting more than one billion individuals worldwide. Economic evidence can help guide the investment in Community Health Workers (CHWs) who can help expand access to preventive and curative NTD services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A scoping review was conducted across ten databases and grey literature, covering studies published between August 2015 and July 2024. Search terms related to “Community Health Workers” and “Economic Evaluations” were used. Studies were screened via Covidence software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on study methodology, costs, and outcomes were extracted, tabulated in Microsoft Excel, and analysed. Of the 29 included scenarios (n = 10 studies), 7 were about community mass drug administration and 22 focused on other topics - such as disease-specific prevention and treatment (e.g., dengue). Across scenarios, the most commonly reported outcomes were cost per service delivered (ranging from $0.13-$5.33) and cost per capita (ranging from $10.24-$21.09). Five scenarios reported on cost-effectiveness, with varied results (40–50% of scenarios were reported as cost effective). One study found that interventions were more likely to be cost-effective when they leveraged integrated care as opposed to vertical approaches. The evidence base for economic evaluations regarding CHW involvement in NTD programs is highly limited. From the 10 studies identified there was no clear conclusion with regards to cost-effectiveness or affordability of CHWs in NTD programs in LMICs. To better understand the critical role CHWs can play in both prevention- and treatment-focused NTD programs, further evidence of the cost-effectiveness and affordability of such interventions is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0005551
JournalPLOS Global Public Health
Volume5
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic evaluations of community health worker programs focussed on neglected tropical diseases in low- and middle-income countries (2015–2024): A scoping literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this