Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Durability of the insecticidal activity of next-generation insecticide treated nets distributed for malaria control in Mozambique Findings from the New Nets Project (2020–2022)

  • Josias Fagbohoun
  • , Ana Paula Abílio
  • , Boris N’Dombidje
  • , Damien Todjinou
  • , Marie Baes
  • , Olivier Pigeon
  • , Germain Gil Padonou
  • , Christen Fornadel
  • , Baltazar Candrinho
  • , Hannah Koenker
  • , Molly Robertson
  • , Joseph Wagman
  • , Corine Ngufor
  • Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)
  • Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC)
  • African Institute for Research in Infectious Diseases (AIRID)
  • Instituto Nacional de Saude Maputo
  • Centre wallon de recherches agronomiques
  • Programa Nacional de Controlo da Malária
  • Tropical Health LLP
  • PATH
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As next-generation insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are increasingly deployed, monitoring their durability under operational conditions is critical to inform procurement and replacement decisions by national malaria programmes. This study evaluated the insecticidal durability of next-generation ITNs distributed in Mozambique through the New Nets Project (2020–2022), focusing on bioefficacy and chemical content over 24 months of household use. ITNs were collected from four districts in Mozambique and included pyrethroid-only nets (MAGNet, DuraNet, Olyset Net), pyrethroid-PBO nets (Olyset Plus), pyrethroid-pyriproxyfen nets (Royal Guard), and pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr nets (Interceptor G2). Nets were withdrawn at 6, 12, and 24 months post-distribution. Bioefficacy was assessed using WHO cone and tunnel bioassays with insecticide-susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae s.l., alongside experimental hut trials in Covè, Benin using wild pyrethroid-resistant mosquito populations. Chemical analysis quantified active ingredient content over time. All net types retained high efficacy against susceptible mosquitoes, with 100% meeting WHO bioefficacy thresholds at all time points. However, Olyset Plus efficacy against resistant mosquitoes declined from 73% at 6 months to 40% at 24 months. Royal Guard showed variable pyriproxyfen performance, improving from 43% to 87%. Interceptor G2 maintained consistently high efficacy against resistant mosquitoes, with ≥92% of nets meeting WHO criteria across all time points. Experimental hut trials confirmed superior field performance of Interceptor G2 compared with pyrethroid-only nets, although mortality declined from 55% to 39% by 24 months. Chemical analysis showed major losses of PBO and chlorfenapyr, with only 8% and 32% remaining at 24 months, respectively. These findings demonstrate substantial variation in the durability of next-generation ITNs and support prioritising pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr nets for malaria control programmes in areas with pyrethroid resistance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0005306
JournalPLOS Global Public Health
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Durability of the insecticidal activity of next-generation insecticide treated nets distributed for malaria control in Mozambique Findings from the New Nets Project (2020–2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this