Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: Insights From the REC-CAGEFREE I Trial

  • Yuehao Lv
  • , Feng Yang
  • , Xiongwei Bai
  • , Hua Wang
  • , Yanqing Wu
  • , Zhenfei Fang
  • , Jingyu Zhou
  • , Haokao Gao
  • , Tao Hu
  • , Dongdong Sun
  • , Qiong Wang
  • , Zhiyong Yin
  • , Shangyu Wen
  • , Yuanzhe Jin
  • , Lang Hong
  • , Jianzheng Liu
  • , Guotao Fu
  • , Ruining Zhang
  • , Xingqiang He
  • , Bin Zhu
  • Zhiwei Jiang, Jielai Xia, Davide Capodanno, Scot Garg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Duolao Wang, Patrick W. Serruys, Ling Tao, Chao Gao
  • Xijing Hospital
  • The First Hospital of Kunming
  • Sichuan University
  • Nanchang University
  • Central South University
  • Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital
  • China Medical University
  • Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
  • Beijing KeyTech Statistical Consulting
  • Air Force Medical University
  • University of Catania
  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • University of Central Lancashire
  • University of Galway
  • University of Science and Technology of China

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: For long coronary lesions, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) might be an attractive alternative compared with drug-eluting stents (DES); however, supporting evidence remains scarce. This analysis aims to compare DCBs versus DES for treating long de novo coronary lesions. 

Aims: To compare the efficacy of DCBs versus DES for treating long de novo coronary lesions. 

Methods: REC-CAGEFREE I was a non-inferiority trial conducted at 43 sites in China, which randomized 2272 patients to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with the option of rescue stenting or sirolimus-eluting stents for treating de novo lesions, regardless of vessel diameter. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, patients were stratified by quantitative coronary angiography-assessed lesion length into short (< 20 mm) and long (≥ 20 mm) groups. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE, including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically and physiologically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 3 years. 

Results: 2,223 (97.8%) participants with available angiograms were included, of which 302 (13.6%) had long lesions and 1921 (86.4%) had short lesions. At 3 years, DoCE occurred in 24/302 (8.0%) and 121/1921 (6.3%) patients in long and short groups, respectively. In the long lesions group, DoCE occurred in 14/121 (11.6%) and 10/181 (5.6%) in the DCBs and DES groups, respectively (HRIPTW: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.07–5.67, p = 0.034). In the short lesions group, DoCE occurred in 75/983 (7.7%) and 46/938 (4.9%) in the DCBs and DES groups, respectively (HRIPTW: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.03–2.22, p = 0.033). No significant interaction was observed between lesion length and DES/DCBs (Pinteraction = 0.460). 

Conclusion: DCBs were associated with a higher risk of DoCE compared to DES for treating de novo lesions, regardless of lesion length.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2026

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • drug-coated balloon
  • drug-eluting stent
  • lesion length
  • long lesion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: Insights From the REC-CAGEFREE I Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this