Does human milk reduce infection rates in preterm infants? A systematic review

A. De Silva, P. W. Jones, Stephen Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the reasons for advocating human milk (HM) feeding for preterm infants is the belief that this provides the infant with a degree of protection from infection. Providing fresh HM for such infants is challenging for mothers and staff, and consequently it is important that its benefits are rigorously evaluated. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken to assess all publications concerned with human milk feeding and infection in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Nine studies - six cohort and three randomised controlled trials (RCT) - were assessed using predefined criteria. Methodological problems included poor study design, inadequate sample size, failure to adjust for confounding variables, and inadequate definitions of HM feeding and outcome measures. In conclusion, the advantage of HM in preventing infection in preterm, (VLBW) infants is not proven by the existing studies. Recommendations are made regarding the methodology required for further study of this important topic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F509-F513
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does human milk reduce infection rates in preterm infants? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this