Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Design and feasibility considerations for a phase 3 efficacy trial of the M72/AS01E-4 tuberculosis vaccine

  • Alemnew F. Dagnew
  • , Robert Noble
  • , Amy Cinar
  • , Erlina Burhan
  • , Gavin Churchyard
  • , Lee Fairlie
  • , Willem A. Hanekom
  • , Monde Muyoyeta
  • , Henry C. Mwandumba
  • , Videlis Nduba
  • , Marla Curran
  • , Alexander C. Schmidt
  • Gates Medical Research Institute
  • Pulmonary Mycosis Centre
  • Universitas Indonesia
  • Respiratory Programmatic Implementation and Research Institute
  • Aurum Institute for Health Research
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • Africa Health Research Institute
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: M72/AS01E-4 demonstrated 50% vaccine efficacy against laboratory-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) disease (VE[D]) among interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-positive, HIV-negative adults in a phase 2b trial. Simulations were used to inform the phase 3 design. 

Methods: We conducted event-driven simulations using lower bound (LB) of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for VE(D). For IGRA-positive participants, assumptions included 1:1 randomization, 9000 participants/arm, 0.4% TB incidence/year, 55% true VE(D), 5% dropout/year, and two-year enrollment. Enrollment irrespective of baseline IGRA status (mixed IGRA-status population) and IGRA-negative–only scenarios were explored to estimate sample sizes and trial duration. 

Results: Simulations demonstrated that 110 events rule out a VE(D) 95% CI LB ≤10%, and 185 events rule out ≤25%, assuming ≥90% power and a true VE(D) of 55%. With 18,000 IGRA-positive participants, simulations projected a 90% probability of accruing 110 events within 3.5 to 4 years and 185 within 5.5 to 6 years. In the mixed IGRA-status population, few endpoints occurred among IGRA-negative participants, yielding insufficient power. Standalone VE(D) evaluation in IGRA-negative participants required large sample sizes (approximately 134,800) and prolonged timelines, indicating infeasibility. Accordingly, the selected primary objective of the phase 3 trial was to confirm VE(D) in IGRA-positive HIV-negative participants using LB of 95% CI for VE(D) > 10% after 110 events; secondary objectives include safety and immunogenicity in HIV-negative IGRA-positive; HIV-negative IGRA-negative; and HIV-positive individuals irrespective of IGRA status. 

Conclusions: An IGRA-positive–enriched, event-driven phase 3 trial is feasible to confirm VE(D) of M72/AS01E-4 while evaluating safety and immunogenicity across IGRA and HIV groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article number128690
JournalVaccine
Volume85
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)
  • M72/AS01E-4
  • Phase 3 clinical trial
  • Tuberculosis vaccine
  • Vaccine efficacy, trial design simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Design and feasibility considerations for a phase 3 efficacy trial of the M72/AS01E-4 tuberculosis vaccine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this